They have so far said they don't want to ruin online play for games blah blah blah, so letting people make their own code (assuming they know how) would kinda bypass their whole" we decide what you get and when" stance
That's not entirelly true.
The reason why we cannot create our own codes is simply because we cannot.
When Datel created this system, only 1-2 people were able to fully decrypt their save so they assumed we wouldn't be able to create codes anyway, as we didn't know what offsets of the save had to be changed and how.
Datel is basically not going to redesign their perfect money making system just because 100 people instead of 2 can now decrypt their save, while only a small group knows what to patch and where.
It makes no sense for Datel to invest money on allowing you to make your own codes if only 10 people are going to use that system.
Plus I'm pretty sure they don't want us to use their 3DS farm to sign random saves with random codes as that would put them in a doubtful situation with Nintendo.
Lol Nintendo doesn't care, since when did they ever take action against Pokemon Hackers. Latiasite is out for over a week now, where are the lawyers? There are none.
Stop saying Datel will be in trouble with Nintendo, Nintendo hasn't done anything.
depends on what was beingLol Nintendo doesn't care, since when did they ever take action against Pokemon Hackers. Latiasite is out for over a week now, where are the lawyers? There are none.
Stop saying Datel will be in trouble with Nintendo, Nintendo hasn't done anything.
Does anybody knows, why datel dont allow us to create codes by ourselves?
I think that's the main reason Datel isn't letting us do that.... but letting ANY user sign whatever they want (you can check saves as much as you want, someone will enventually find a way to sign other things)...
You do realise that even if I write a program in assembly to bruteforce the AES MAC, it's possible that it'd take from now till the end of the universe to crack... and assuming I did crack it, it'd only be good for that one time use.. so better have everything you want in one save I guess.[...]but letting ANY user sign whatever they want (you can check saves as much as you want, someone will enventually find a way to sign other things) [...]
You do realise that even if I write a program in assembly to bruteforce the AES MAC, it's possible that it'd take from now till the end of the universe to crack... and assuming I did crack it, it'd only be good for that one time use.. so better have everything you want in one save I guess.
Did you even read the rest of the post?
I was referring to the fact that should Datel allowed us to use our own codes on our own saves, someone would eventually find a way to upload something that is not a save to their system, apply a null code and get the original file signed by their 3DS farm.
This could lead to piracy because you could basically sign ELFs and then load them with a Gateway using a custom payload.
Did you even read the rest of the post?
I was referring to the fact that should Datel allowed us to use our own codes on our own saves, someone would eventually find a way to upload something that is not a save to their system, apply a null code and get the original file signed by their 3DS farm.
This could lead to piracy because you could basically sign ELFs and then load them with a Gateway using a custom payload.
We know, we don't need to hear another message about this, patience.i hope the latiosite come back soon... i dont care about diance, hoopa and volcanion, only latiosite =/
any news on the pokeball pattern vivillon event?