This is becoming a weekly thing now and as if that wasn't bad enough, there's police who don't even carry guns so they're as pointless or even more than a regular citizen. On the off chance, a citizen might carry a weapon for self-defence so he/she could be more useful than a police officer and attempt to save his/her life from the attackers.
The mentality that carrying a weapon is harmful is downright retarded. When you strip the citizens out of protection you're allowing the criminals to do what they want with us.
The EU doesn't give a shit about the European continent or its people, they only focus on making $$$ out of it. Eastern-Europe is against EU's policies and they're living without terrorist attacks or "refugees" invading them.
Please at least try to show a hint of knowledge, this was homegrown terror, funnily enough only one of the past attacks was done by an immigrant.
And to blame this all on syrian refugees is like blaming Jews for what Hitler did.
Agreed! Just two days ago I heard a bomb blast in Afghanistan killing 84.
The best solution is to make fine glass out of the middle East or just let them be you know stop all trading and shit except India it's good.
And we muslims are called the violent ones... Funny how the people become the monsters they fear.
And every time you protect the ideology you make things worse. H. Clinton and B.H. Obama didn't even say the word Islamic or Islam. Nor did Obama allow the people in his government to say/write it. It's the big elephant in the room destroying things and we are forced to look down and don't mention the elephant. And if we do we are elephantophobes.
It's much easier to justify child marriage, religious wars, sex slavery, killing for mockery, killing of apostates etc by looking at Islamic texts and the founder of the religion than it is to justify child abuse of Catholic priests or bombings of abortion clinics (in which 10 or so people died in history).
But for argument's sake let's assume that all religions are equally bad.
The biggest difference between Muslims and Christians is that the latter have relativized (put into perspective) their religion. It is only a tiny minority in the Muslim communities who is willing to actually kill and die for their faith. But their is a much larger percentage of people with scary world views that foster terrorism. I don't need to quote any studies, you can look them up yourself. If a migrant wants to attack somebody for insulting "his" prophet (or wants the government to punish the person), he has no place in a modern society, for instance. And no, his "prophet" is not more dear to him than his mother. If that's the case, he needs to go to a mental hospital. Religions are ideas and ideas can be criticized.
By protecting the ideology, things are only going to get worse. Muslims don't need a reformation (one could argue that Wahabism and the Salafist movement are already the reformation: going back to how the prophet and his companions lived), they need the enlightenment/critical thinking.
It is in fact racist to thing that Muslims can't handle enlightenment.
I'd agree with you on most of your points but I'd like to discuss a few of them.
"And if we do we are elephantophobes"
I'm not sure if you're suggesting this but if you're saying Islamophobia doesn't exist at all then you must also accept that neither does anti-Semitism, racism, sexism, homophobia or xenophobia.
Now, are you willing to suggest there is no such thing as an irrational, hatred filled, fear of Islam?
Of course, it is completely rational to criticise a religion and I'll have you know that it is completely within the rights of non-Muslim to criticise Islam and for any Muslim to suggest otherwise, they've obviously learnt little about the past of Islamic society.
In the early centuries of the Islamic
Caliphate, the
Islamic law allowed citizens to freely express their views, including criticism of Islam and religious authorities, without fear of persecution.
[21][22][23] As such, there have been several notable critics and skeptics of Islam that arose from within the Islamic world itself. In tenth and eleventh-century
Syria there lived a blind poet called
Al-Ma'arri. He became well known for a poetry that was affected by a "pervasive pessimism." He labeled religions in general as "noxious weeds" and said that Islam does not have a monopoly on truth.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Islam#Medieval_Islamic_world
Citations:
- Boisard, Marcel A. (July 1980). "On the Probable Influence of Islam on Western Public and International Law". International Journal of Middle East Studies. 11 (4): 429–50. doi:10.1017/s0020743800054805.
- "Nahjul Balagha Part 1, The Sermons". Al-Islam.org.
- Ronald Bontekoe, Mariėtta Tigranovna Stepaniants (1997). Justice and Democracy. University of Hawaii Press. p. 251. ISBN 0-8248-1926-8.
" But their is a much larger percentage of people with scary world views that foster terrorism"
could you elaborate on this point?
"
they need the enlightenment/critical thinking"
You might need to elaborate on this too seeing as how I don't quite get how you get from having terrorists to "all muslims need to think differently"
Of course I'm going to assume that you're assuming some Islamic rulings are actually true and not things that have been used by non-muslims for decades to try and make Islam something it is not.