- Joined
- Nov 15, 2003
- Messages
- 1,106
- Trophies
- 0
- Age
- 33
- Location
- Sindh
- Website
- Visit site
- XP
- 204
- Country
Well i played it for half hour and i didn`t liked it. There are much better platformers on GBA than this one.
I agree, it's certantly not in the top 10 platformers, but it's a good time-waster and flashcart-filler nonetheless. It's very fast-paced, too, it takes a while to master the controls.Well i played it for half hour and i didn`t liked it. There are much better platformers on GBA than this one.
I played the original on the Amiga 1200 today and that version hasnt aged at all for me, the new version would be great but the levels are shoddy.I played it and find it cool. The music are surprisingly good and audible for a gba game. Also i think that the same cheat work in this game. It is a more colored version of the genesis/snes/amiga. it is a port of the ps version.
The game is good but way too linear now, it has been hurt by the time.
off topic and stupid remark. the snes has too much colours and a too low resolution to handle it => crappy sprites. you don't want to open a new battle snes versus genesis right ? the flames are still the same.Genesis games sure do have crappy colours as opposed to the SNES.
It was called Aquatic Games, it was gonna be a multiplayer extra with this game when Swing where gonna publish it (back when it was gonna be a straight port) . Chances of it coming out are slim the reason this version has new levels is because the original developers only wanted Swing! to release it but they lost the rights to the game and someone else got rights to the engine and the name but not the levels and the original developers still own Aquatic Games name.I myself liked James Pond, anyone know when or if they will drop that James Pond Water Olympics game? Or even remember it, it was somewhat of an underwater events game.
I don't think it's a stupid remark if this is a genesis game. It is isn't it? That would explain the crappy looking colours. No I don't want to start a battle over it because I already know I'm right.off topic and stupid remark. the snes has too much colours and a too low resolution to handle it => crappy sprites.
Who the hell is that troll judging games based on their colors which would magically happen to be based on the console the game runs on?
Anyways, YAY for James Pond
Well, the flaming zone is still full of jesters. Hopefully i am not the only one to see it. Colours based on consoles, arf stupid really. And he is sure of this fact, lol. eof.I don't think it's a stupid remark if this is a genesis game. It is isn't it? That would explain the crappy looking colours. No I don't want to start a battle over it because I already know I'm right.off topic and stupid remark. the snes has too much colours and a too low resolution to handle it => crappy sprites.