@Lilith Valentine seems to hate luma3ds for no damn reason at all. I agree that other devs not having the support luma is a problem, but that's not a reason not to use luma.
There is such a thing as too many features a certain user may not be interested inYeah, we do, but I don't get why you hate luma even though it has way more features than any other cfw.
As long as they're unobtrusive I don't see an issue.There is such a thing as too many features a certain user may not be interested in
thats wrong, luma is a noob signature patcher, corbenik is the patcher with "way more features"Yeah, we do, but I don't get why you hate luma even though it has way more features than any other cfw.
No, it's not. It has less features than luma, it just gives you control over absolutely everything in the cfw.thats wrong, luma is a noob signature patcher, corbenik is the patcher with "way more features"
you successfully proved my post right, by using exactly this sentence, thanks, luma is nothing against reinand also. reinand will be the first n3ds "cfw" forever, and I don't really care about its fork, also corbenik/skeith whatever name the dev is now using is still better.No, it's not. It has less features than luma, it just gives you control over absolutely everything in the cfw.
Nope, it has the same features (except Rosalina) in form of bytecode patches.No, it's not. It has less features than luma, it just gives you control over absolutely everything in the cfw.
Luma3DS completely rewrote all the former ReiNAND code, which is why it's not listed as a fork anymore...and I don't really care about its fork
How? How did I prove you right? And FYI, I used corbenik until a few weeks before it was discontinued. Luma just has way too many features for me to not switch to it.you successfully proved my post right, by using exactly this sentence, thanks, luma is nothing against reinand also. reinand will be the first n3ds "cfw" forever, and I don't really care about its fork, also corbenik/skeith whatever name the dev is now using is still better.
I know, I check certain repos daily, but some people seem to forget that luma would not exist without reinandLuma3DS completely rewrote all the former ReiNAND code, which is why it's not listed as a fork anymore...
I'm not denying anyone's right to speech, in fact I'm more than happy to engage in dialogue about the new features of luma.This petty arguing derailing the thread wouldn't occur if those Luma crusaders had the notion of Hall who once said "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
So? That doesn't make it any less unique.I know, I check certain repos daily, but some people seem to forget that luma would not exist without reinand
Just because something came first doesn't mean it's the best...I know, I check certain repos daily, but some people seem to forget that luma would not exist without reinand
"Complete control" exactly what luma is missing. I don't see any great features on luma which I can't have on any other up to date patcherHow? How did I prove you right? And FYI, I used corbenik until a few weeks before it was discontinued. Luma just has way too many features for me to not switch to it.
Region free does indeed get in my way, since I use the launcher from 8.x on all my O3DS, and the region free patch causes "the black squares" (normally hidden apps becoming visible) on Home versions less of that bundled with 9.0As long as they're unobtrusive I don't see an issue.
Yeah thanks for startinghow to start a cfw war in 1 easy step!
That's actually one of the first valid points I've seen for a whileRegion free does indeed get in my way, since I use the launcher from 8.x on all my O3DS, and the region free patch causes "the black squares" (normally hidden apps becoming visible) on Home versions less of that bundled with 9.0
who said its the best?Just because something came first doesn't mean it's the best...
By that logic we'd all still be using Gateway or Palatine because it came first right guys?