How Many Nukes Will It Really Take to Instantly Annihilate Humanity?

Discussion in 'General Off-Topic Chat' started by VVoltz, Aug 30, 2009.

  1. VVoltz
    OP

    Member VVoltz The Pirate Lord

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2002
    Messages:
    2,727
    Location:
    USA
    Country:
    Bolivia
    I found this article at Gizmodo, seems interesting.

    Forget about nuclear winter. Humans are resilient. We will survive. So how many nukes will it take to destroy every single human being in the planet, on first blast? Here's the calculation in graphic form—with a surprising answer:

    The first part of the graphic—created by David McCandless—shows how much space is actually used by the entire population. According to the Guardian Datablog and the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, only 12.5% of the planet's surface is actually occupied by humans. A total of 18,617,500 square kilometers.

    [​IMG]

    Now, the most powerful active nuclear warhead in the world is the B83, which has a destructive power of two hundred Little Boys, the bomb that destroyed part of Hiroshima. That's a 14.9-square-kilometer total destruction area. Complete instant tanning, and obliteration of anything in sight. To give you an idea of what this space means, Manhattan is 58.8 square kilometers. Central London is 26 square kilometers.

    [​IMG]
    Now divide the total number of square kilometers by the destruction radius of the B83 to get the total number of nukes required for instant annihilation. As you can see, we need 123.36 times the amount of nukes available today: 10,227 nukes vs 1,241,166 nukes needed to completely disintegrate every single one of us in a millisecond.

    Conclusion: WE NEED MORE NUKES, NOT FEWER. Better die instantly than having to survive nuclear winter and yet another horrible movie with Mel Gibson playing Mad Max. One that would last for a few hundred years at that. [David McCandless—Thanks David Keyes]

    [​IMG]

    Original post here. What do you guys think?
     
  2. Hop2089

    Member Hop2089 Cute>Hot

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2008
    Messages:
    3,810
    Country:
    United States
    I would say a 1000 large nukes can take out civilization if they're launched properly.
     
  3. Sterling

    Member Sterling GBAtemp's Silver Hero

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4,023
    Location:
    Texas
    Country:
    United States
    damn lol. I laugh in the face of death [​IMG] If that ever happens I'll eat every sock I own before the nukes huff and puff me and my house.
     
  4. VVoltz
    OP

    Member VVoltz The Pirate Lord

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2002
    Messages:
    2,727
    Location:
    USA
    Country:
    Bolivia
    Don't worry kids, you know Dr. Manhattan will save us, or rather will save the US.
     
  5. Satangel

    Member Satangel BEAST

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2006
    Messages:
    10,255
    Location:
    Bruges, Belgium
    Country:
    Belgium
    Wow, that's some amazing info right here!
    I never knew a nuke would only destroy such a small surface. I always thought it would be whole countries at once....
    Thanks for learning me something new today [​IMG]
     
  6. Maz7006

    Member Maz7006 iSEXu

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2008
    Messages:
    3,622
    Country:
    Lebanon
    this is a good read when its actually happening, you'll actually have a glimer of hope at the time. [​IMG]
     
  7. Veho

    Global Moderator Veho The man who cried "Ni".

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    8,452
    Location:
    Zagreb
    Country:
    Croatia
    No he won't. He doesn't care.
     
  8. Eternal Myst

    Member Eternal Myst Back from the Myst.

    Joined:
    May 2, 2008
    Messages:
    1,634
    Location:
    I have a bomb alallalallala
    Country:
    United States
    it's over 9000!
     
  9. vettacossx

    Member vettacossx Wii Theme Team Founder

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    1,329
    Location:
    Right Behind You! Uh Oh!
    Country:
    Ireland
    if history servers...thats OLD TECH.....(Nukes that is)

    Personally i worry more of a BIOLOGICAL or CHEMICAL Hiroshima...

    and if you think the mindless cleche that is "teerorrism" kills remember this:

    http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Health/T...Healthcare.html

    ALOT LESS PEOPLE DIE FROM "terrorism" than heart related illness every year WORLD WIDE...

    why dont you look and see what the gov allocated its funds for...the answer would make you SICK.....



    This is all to perpetuate the monetary system that is by all means OUT DATED in comparison to the technology available that could fuel a resource based economy *that wouldnt be perfect but WOULD BE ALOT BETTER THAN ANYTHING WE HAVE NOW!

    The monetary system perpetuates greed, war, scarcity, hate, and lack of general education...


    TO LEARN THE TRUTH WATCH THIS!:


    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7065205277695921912
     
  10. ca_michelbach

    Member ca_michelbach GBAtemp Fan

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2008
    Messages:
    345
    Location:
    The Vualt
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    You don't necessarily have to destroy a large amount of people with the nukes, they could be used to chemically polute water suplies and take out necessary resources. This would take longer to wipe out humanity but it would mean you could do it with less nukes.
     
  11. megawalk

    Member megawalk The Legendary SRW Addict

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2008
    Messages:
    1,067
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Country:
    Netherlands
    it requires alot to make it "The Real Fallout 3"
    and let the world live in a shady surface (atleast what's left of it)
     
  12. geedub

    Member geedub GBAtemp Fan

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2008
    Messages:
    396
    Location:
    Scotland
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    in theory only one !
     
  13. Hop2089

    Member Hop2089 Cute>Hot

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2008
    Messages:
    3,810
    Country:
    United States
    The Nuke would have to be the size of Texas though for any results.
     
  14. HaniKazmi

    Member HaniKazmi GBAtemp Advanced Maniac

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1,657
    Location:
    Manchester
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Thats only if you want to kill everyone in a flash. It will take far less to push the earth beyond recovery though.
     
  15. geedub

    Member geedub GBAtemp Fan

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2008
    Messages:
    396
    Location:
    Scotland
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    it really depends how far out of the box you want to look at this !

    once one nuke is released , the rest will follow !

    if one nuke could cause enough dust or watever to block out the sun , then were back in the ice age !

    or if it ever becomes possible to nuke the sun , we too are gone

    even nuking the moon , we're gone !

    if a nuke was to penetrate down to the core , we are gone !

    just think about that lol
     
  16. Danny600kill

    Member Danny600kill xD

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    1,664
    Location:
    Manchester
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    or we could gather every human and put them on one large land mass eg america the release only a few nukes an bobs ur uncles everyones dead but in a war i dont think everyone will crown into america so scrap that idea
     

Share This Page