I'm amazed I'm one of the few voters of 'mediocre'. And incidentally, I'm just busy upgrading a windows 7 laptop to 10 (because why not?).
Yes, if you're looking directly at the OS itself, 7 looks nicer. And if 10 is faster, it's only noticeable if you're holding a stopwatch (this may differ if you're running a low-end rig). But aside from a weird color issue which solved itself (most likely through updates), I've had zero problems with it. And that's saying something: I'm using 7 at work and 10 at home and can barely tell them apart (the fact that I'm using classicshell on 10 may help in this aspect). Sure, it has a shitload of features I could care less about or which I downright disable (like all the privacy-stuff), but I'd rather have my PC park run a single OS rather than a mixture.
And if you think that's a pretty weak argument, consider the reasons why some people damn every other windows to hell:
-Millennium: crashes more programs than that it actually runs them
-Vista: bane of the devil because it has driver and security issues
-8: the tiles are horrible!
-10: privacy issues
Notice the trend? I'm not saying it's all negligible, but come on...it's not like the reason people give microsoft hell each time (and each time as much if not more, if you ask me) gets worse every time they release another window. Where will this trend goes to? "windows 11 a colossal failure because the default desktop background is ugly"..."some under-average PC's boot a couple milliseconds slower"..."it's not as good as we dreamed it would be on our virtual 3D wearable smartwatch (even though we have no clue how to improve it)"
On the other hand: the whole "it's pretty much the same" is meh for the very same reason. MS got pretty stagnant after 7. Like their whole idea to merge smartphones, pc's, tablets and game consoles was something that all that there ambitions really were (and nonetheless failing even that, if you want to be critic about some of their UI designs).
Yes, if you're looking directly at the OS itself, 7 looks nicer. And if 10 is faster, it's only noticeable if you're holding a stopwatch (this may differ if you're running a low-end rig). But aside from a weird color issue which solved itself (most likely through updates), I've had zero problems with it. And that's saying something: I'm using 7 at work and 10 at home and can barely tell them apart (the fact that I'm using classicshell on 10 may help in this aspect). Sure, it has a shitload of features I could care less about or which I downright disable (like all the privacy-stuff), but I'd rather have my PC park run a single OS rather than a mixture.
And if you think that's a pretty weak argument, consider the reasons why some people damn every other windows to hell:
-Millennium: crashes more programs than that it actually runs them
-Vista: bane of the devil because it has driver and security issues
-8: the tiles are horrible!
-10: privacy issues
Notice the trend? I'm not saying it's all negligible, but come on...it's not like the reason people give microsoft hell each time (and each time as much if not more, if you ask me) gets worse every time they release another window. Where will this trend goes to? "windows 11 a colossal failure because the default desktop background is ugly"..."some under-average PC's boot a couple milliseconds slower"..."it's not as good as we dreamed it would be on our virtual 3D wearable smartwatch (even though we have no clue how to improve it)"
On the other hand: the whole "it's pretty much the same" is meh for the very same reason. MS got pretty stagnant after 7. Like their whole idea to merge smartphones, pc's, tablets and game consoles was something that all that there ambitions really were (and nonetheless failing even that, if you want to be critic about some of their UI designs).
