Costello said:
you can't expect respect if you don't respect us in the first place.
There's been plenty of respect, some has been lost, but not all. Still, an authorative figure should always handle things professionally. But personally, I was not bothered by his comment.
My only point that I'm trying to make is that I'm sure that most people who did the judging had never tried punes app. So since that is the case, how could he have ever been given a fair chance? Out of the 162 points that were divided among the wii homebrew apps (I'm assuming 1 point = 1 vote, correct me if there was not 162 judges and let me know how it really worked), but no matter what the case was, I'm sure only a very very small percentage actually tried punes app out. I bet even a smaller percentage actually flashed the created nand.bin to their wii. I am willing to bet most judges just read the description and said to themselves "ehh, it sounds cool, but not what I care about", and then they never bothered to look into it even deeper.
Really, how many of the judges can
honestly say that they downloaded punes apps and tried them out?
Out of all the entried in the competition, his thread about ohneswanzenegger has the third most replies from other users in the homebrew bounty entries section of the forum. His thread has the most out of all the wii homebrew entries. The only 2 other threads that have more replies are for DS and DSI homebrew. So there is OBVIOUSLY quite an interest in the community for his app. Although the amount of replies in a thread does not give an exact science about how interested other users are, but it certainly says a lot.
And the reason why I say that pune deserves an apology is because of all those who did the judging but did not bother to even try out his app. That is extremely unfair. Anyone who puts an app (or 3) into a competition should have their app/s looked at by the 'qualified' judges. Each judge should take the same amount of time playing with each homebrew app to be able to make a fair and unbiased opinion.
I'm sure this will now get a bunch of replies with people saying that they tried it out, even though they are lying and never even downloaded it. But to prove my point, I'll have pune pull up the statistics for when and how many times his apps have been downloaded. If anyone who was a judge had decided to not download the app before the judging started (which was most) then there should have been a big increase in the amount of times it was downloaded when the judging started *if* the judges were giving every developer a fair chance.
How many of the judges had non-vulnerable boot1 wii's (so no bootmii in boot2) would even dare have the balls to try flashing some randomly created nand.bin file to their wii? I'm probably one of the few willing to do that.
So was pune given a fair chance? No. Did he deserve better than that? Yes.
The whole point to this competition was to reward those who develop great thing and to give them encouragement to continue on with what they are great, well, now we just lost the wonderful potential of someone who has already done a huge amount of work and effort for the community.
I've donated to pune a few different times in the past. I test things out for him. At least if he makes something and decides not to share with the community, then I'm sure he would still share with me. So this is all the communities loss, not so much mine.