but somehow the mosque needs some type of special consideration.
OK, we've established it's not a "Ground Zero Mosque" but the continued use of weasle words is basically an admission that people can't argue against what it ACTUALLY is, so go on, I'll humour you. What 'special consideration' is this centre getting? Any other centre, funded by private citizens, on private land would have been allowed to go ahead no problem whatsoever. You know, land of the free, the free market, freedom from government interference. A Christian-based centre with a basketball court and what have you would have no problems in spite of your assertion that you're practically being fed to the lions over there
But there's a real possibility that this centre will be blocked from being built. So I guess you're right, this pretendy scary ooga-booga brown people terror mosque is getting special consideration, just not in the direction you imply.
QUOTE said:
I can understand the people here in support of this in a constitutional sense, I totally agree. But those that support this as some sort of cultural outreach on one hand, and yet you slap down Christianity on the other, I will have to give a respectful "shame on you".
No-one is 'slapping down' Christianity, give your whiney little politically correct victim complex a rest.
QUOTEPandering to terrorists
Wait, the people who want to open a community centre are terrorists now?
QUOTE