- Joined
- Jan 12, 2011
- Messages
- 3,471
- Trophies
- 0
- Age
- 27
- Location
- Throwing milk at the bitches!
- XP
- 1,337
- Country
Daaaaammmmnnn. What the hell would you need that for? Running space stations?
Running triple monitors, 3D gaming, or very high resolution such as 2560 x 1600.Daaaaammmmnnn. What the hell would you need that for? Running space stations?
Running triple monitors, 3D gaming, or very high resolution such as 2560 x 1600.
FX-4130!? You bought Zambezi instead!?its the fx 4130
Much better, FX-43xx is much better than FX-41xx. Bulldozer/Zambezi has a lot of problems, and Piledriver/Vishera (2nd gen Bulldozer) improved on it quite a bit. Piledriver/Vishera has competitive raw performance against Intel Sandy Bridge at respective price point (ie: FX 8 cores vs i5 4 cores, FX 6/4 cores vs i3 2 cores).
Unfortunately, 8350rocks and dirtyferret are not telling the truth. For the game (Starcraft 2) you about to play,http://www.tomshardware.com/answers/id-1693236/amd-fx4130-good.html
im getting conflicting reports im just going to stick with what I have
Here is my thinking. I consider CPU to be a long term investment. A good CPU lasts longer, slower CPU on the other hand does not. Unlike GPU when you replace CPU you also likely need to replace the motherboard as well.im soo confused
Here is my thinking. I consider CPU to be a long term investment. A good CPU lasts longer, slower CPU on the other hand does not. Unlike GPU when you replace CPU you also likely need to replace the motherboard as well.
Sure some might argue that fps difference is not huge, but keep in mind this is for current game. The gap will slowly widening for future game.
I do agree with what dirtyferrethave said about overclocking. It certainly is one way to bring out more performance, if you don't mind taking the time to do overclocking.
he bought it for SC2, so when the next SC games comes out, he can change the CPU again (?)