Ah I'm glad you asked. We can all pretty much agree that you're born gay and it's not a choice. So it's obvious that if you're born that way then something must have gone wrong during fetal development. If something happens during fetal development to cause someone to be gay then I'd imagine that a cause could be indemnified. If a cause can be identified then you should be able to screen for it and find a cure at some point. Now I can guarantee if you could screen for it then 99% of parents would choose not to have a gay child. It pretty obvious that being gay isn't the natural order of things and of course these people shouldn't be hated for something that they didn't choose.Urza said:How is being gay a "disorder"?Pliskron said:Sephxus said:@Pliskron Let me give you some perspective.
Replace homosexuality with another biological trait:
ex1
So wait a minute . If being black is biological and not a choice then we should help fund a cure for such a sad disorder. I mean would you want your children to be inflicted with such a horrible milady. I think it's worth funding research. I think that's something we can all get behind religious or not.
ex2
So wait a minute . If being a woman is biological and not a choice then we should help fund a cure for such a sad disorder. I mean would you want your children to be inflicted with such a horrible milady. I think it's worth funding research. I think that's something we can all get behind religious or not
Being black or a woman isn't a disorder but being autistic or having downs syndrome or being gay is a disorder. It's abnormal for someone to want to have sex with a partner of the same sex. It's innocuous on the scale of disorders but it's something that I bet you could screen for and perhaps even cure in the future. It's certainly worth doing if possible. Seriously, how many parents would chose that type of disorder for their child. Now I really wouldn't mind if my child was female but it seems to me that your argument is bordering on "it's ok because God made them that way". That seems kind of a backward argument to me.








