Gameplay Or Graphics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted-119707
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 10,122
  • Replies Replies 100

Gameplay Or Graphics?

  • Gameplay (Why?)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Graphics (Why?)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Both (Why?)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Don't Care (Why?)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
Both really. Even if the gameplay is good, if the graphics are shitty... It's just harder to play.
I do have low standards for "good graphics" though... But covoluted graphics are a no-no. Which is why don't play... say... Dwarf Fortress =p
 
i chose gameplay.
lets look at the work in progress sonic demo
the 3d thingy for the ds
no gameplay but good graphics..............................................
so it's good


i meant it's not that good
because the graphics are good

i meant becuase the gameplay sucks
 
whoa, my inbox is filled with this topic lol. nice to see different views on this =D
 
if the game has like best graphics ever but gets boring after 2 seconds.....wats the point......starcraft is one of the best rts of all time...the graphics are not that good...diablo 2 has bad graphics but its hella fun, MARIO BROTHERS has bad graphics but its simplicity and classic design is what makes it fun...not graphics....
 
I just don't like the reaaally crappy 3D and I believe that's it's better to have more beautiful 2D than 3D and actually if a game has just good graphics and not good gameplay you'll get bored in like 5 minutes or so.
 
There are certain games in which I don't mind the gameplay cause I feel like looking at every detail on the screen such as Ecco the dolphin for Dreamcast, nights for saturn, and Metal Slug sometimes. I loved animations on Zelda Link's Awakening DX... but then again I love games such as Liero, Soldat, liquid wars (of which a port for DS would be amazing).

I voted for "both". Most of the times I like a combination of both, but sometimes I like gameplay, others just beautiful graphics will do.
 
Gameplay.
You can have the best graphics ever, but if the gameplay sucks, then I'm not gonna play it
wink.gif
 
Gameplay. Because i was a child of the 80's. I've watched graphics grow and change. And i've played a lot of the shit they've brought with them! Not that graphics are bad, but thats just like saying the sound is the most important thing. Graphics are secondary to gameplay... because if the gameplay sucks, the game sucks. If the graphics suck, you have 8-bit.
tongue.gif
 
I could careless about graphics as long as the gameplay is good, with a nice story line and entertaining. If those 2 things suck, might as well hide its faults with the best graphics ever
smile.gif
 
Voted: Both
Why?: Why not have both? It makes a better game
tongue.gif


But yeah, if I can't have both, I'd choose gameplay. I grew up on Duck Hunt and Super Mario Brothers 3, and I have to say, they're better than most games coming out today, even though their "graphics suck" (I actually think they still look nice
tongue.gif
)
 
ShiningSaber said:
Voted: Both
Why?: Why not have both? It makes a better game
tongue.gif


But yeah, if I can't have both, I'd choose gameplay. I grew up on Duck Hunt and Super Mario Brothers 3, and I have to say, they're better than most games coming out today, even though their "graphics suck" (I actually think they still look nice
tongue.gif
)
This.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum