i respect costello and shoptemp but i'll add that from my own personal information digging that the dingoo digital team *MIGHT* be giving out false information. It has been reported that they OEM'ed the design. If this information is correct this might account for the "HK" dingoos.
from what i can gather from resellers the dingoo was OEM'ed. the wholesale outlet in china has been telling resellers for the past 6 months that the design was sold. what came out of that was a bunch of dingoo's in a shell without the "dingoo digital" logo. the official team is saying these are clones, but the wholesale outlets who get their product direct from the factory have a different song to sing.
there is most defiantly an "HK" version. there are images of this build at the dingoonity forum. "HK" comes at the end of the serial number which can be found near the bottom left speaker. further more the "HK" build on a hardware level uses different memory. usually it is 2 2GB chips and not 1 4GB chip. Also there are "HK" versions which only have 1 GB or 2GB of internal memory. the "HK" version of the dingoo as been reported (with images and testing to back it up) as being shipped with inferior batteries. The "HK" version is so real in fact that a different unbricking application had to be "hacked" to work on it (thanks joyrider). That is because the hardware is different, the build is different, and this version is real.
some information:
http://boards.dingoonity.org/dingoo-hardwa...confusion!/
are these all clones as the official team has said or is this just an OEM blunder? i do not know for sure. the official team is denying any knowledge of the "HK" build or the problems which have been reported for the past 6 months?
the native apps/3d games/gba games/emus had to all be patched to work on the "HK" build. thanks in part to dingoo-digital-usa.com and MTH (dingoo hacker).
http://boards.dingoonity.org/dingoo-hardwa...11454/#msg11454
I also have a response from thinkgeek.com:
QUOTE said:
I can actually just let you know that these are the HK versions specifically made for us though.
again, i'm not trying to be the jerk who starts problems in this thread. i do not blame shoptemp or gbatemp for posting what they did. when it comes from the team's mouth you tend to believe it. but if the "HK" version is a myth why do people own it and have problems with it?
dingoo digital needs to sort out their problem, and releasing an updated clone of an already existing system is not the answer.
if only one version of the dingoo is available why are there multiple versions for sale? "HK" vs "non-HK", shells with different branding (dingoo digital, paw print, non-paw print), main board builds with 1GB of internal mem, 2GB, or 4GB, main board builds with 2 2GB chips with the same logo as ones with 1 4GB chip, different warning images for both the "HK" and "non-HK" builds, different memory address issues between the builds, different batteries between the builds, different 3rd party emu functionality between the builds, etc.
there is a ton of proof that there are indeed more than 1 build of the dingoo a320, yet the official teams says this is not the case?
let me add in conclusion that the "HK" build is not a problem any longer. there is a working unbricker tool for it. all of the problem apps/homebrew/etc have been patched. the patch has been added into the unofficial dingoo sdk. the only real problem is getting less than you pay for. this would be less internal memory and a cheap battery. if your dingoo does not have 4GB of internal memory, return it! the export version always shipped with 4GB and this is the version you want. i would also recommend you do some research before blindly dropping homebrew onto the device. if you do have an "HK" build (which, well, the team now says isn't real =P) you could potential brick it.