CannonFoddr said:
sfg said:
The Acekard has been cloned for ages, only it wasn't called Acekard, but R4 Ultra or whatever else...
But yeah, this has more impact on people looking to buy Acekards.
QUOTE said:
No its AKAIO thats dead.In related news, Nintendo has announced that due to rampant piracy they will leave the video game business and start a line of pencil sharpeners. They hope this new business will be more profitable because who cracks pencil sharpeners, know what I'm saying????
Ha Ha very funny.... Mind you they could always go back to what they USE to do - they use to
make Playing Cards
... Oh hang on - They USE to make playing cards & now they're trying to prevent a different type of playing cards from being made.... I smell a conspiracy here
Sorry, I don't mean to revive an old thread but I got an Acekard 2i recently. Looks legit but I don't want to peel the sticker off.
I was surprised to hear Nintendo used to manufacture playing cards, and after reading that wiki, I'm even more surprised to hear that they STILL make them today! There goes your conspiracy CannonFoddr.
No problem
As for checking your card out - since this post was last looked at I dug around a few more forums and found some additional info that most people seem to agree on.
Going by the photos on Acekards site can be confusing (especially if you happen to have an older ak2i like I have - based on their photos I have a fake
)QUOTE
To find your HW ID - if you can get AKAIO to run, press [Start] > Help - & you'll see a HW number
Depending on the number determines whether you have a 'fake' or not. Searching through forums posts it seems that generally
Acekard 2.1 = HW:80 = Real
Acekard 2i with Actel chip = HW:44 = Real
Acekard 2i with Actel chip = HW:80 = Possible Fake (although it seems AKAIO still works with this version)
Acekard with 'new chip' = HW:81 = Real
Other numbers mentioned but which I haven't found out whether they are fakes or real are 'HW:41' and 'HW:88'
It is Possible that 'HW:41' MAY actually be for Acekard 2's (not 2.1 or 'i'), since it's mentioned in
this review.