Casey Anothony NOT GUILTY

[ShadowSoldier]

I thought this was a video game forum...

Don't even bother my friend. People have complained before, but the general consensus is that users can post whatever news they want (as long as it's real, not spam, duplicate, or crap), gaming related or not.

 

[gloweyjoey]

I think people arent outraged because they wanted to see her die for what she did, they just want to see her held responsible since she is the one that was supposed to be there to protect the child and the childs well being.

But the thing is all the people who want her dead punished, don't know the whole story, none of us was there, none of us knows what really happened.
Guilty or not people's lust for a "hanging" is all I see.
people are sharping their pitch forks and hyping their mob mentality based on what they hear from bias news reporting.

Guess what people, not everything on the news is real.

should we just start convicting people based on speculations and feelings?

You're simply generalizing at this point.
I think you are also confused between people who want to see a conviction as opposed to people who want to see a punishment. We know SOMETHING happend to this almost three year old girl and her mother was the last person to be seen with.

If the little girl did indeed die on accident, she needs to be held responsible for not telling anyone for 31 days, dumping the body, and lying repeatedly to officers and she needs to be held responsible for all the time, effort and money that was used in the search efforts to find this little girl that she said herself she still believed to be alive but died in an accident and she bagged up the body and dumped it.

I will agree with you though, there are a lot of people who are just hyped up on pictures and videos of this little girl and don't know much of anything about the case and didn't until last month. I guarantee you, not everyone that wanted to see a conviction, not just a capital murder conviction, is one of these people.

 

[RoMee]

You're simply generalizing at this point.
I think you are also confused between people who want to see a conviction as opposed to people who want to see a punishment. We know SOMETHING happend to this almost three year old girl and her mother was the last person to be seen with.

If the little girl did indeed die on accident, she needs to be held responsible for not telling anyone for 31 days, dumping the body, and lying repeatedly to officers and she needs to be held responsible for all the time, effort and money that was used in the search efforts to find this little girl that she said herself she still believed to be alive but died in an accident and she bagged up the body and dumped it.

I will agree with you though, there are a lot of people who are just hyped up on pictures and videos of this little girl and don't know much of anything about the case and didn't until last month. I guarantee you, not everyone that wanted to see a conviction, not just a capital murder conviction, is one of these people.

"IF" the little girl did indeed die.

you yourself don't know for sure, why else would you use "If".
and that's my point, no one knows what happened. It's all speculations, and a bunch of I think this happened, I think that happened, blah, blah, blah.

should we just start convicting people based on people's speculations and feelings?

and to see so many people who lives thousands of miles away, who knows nothing about what happened (other than what they hear from nancy grace)
demanding the death of a women they know nothing about (other than what they see on TV).
sure you see all the bad crap she does but no one seems to give a shit about any thing good she might had done (if any) because all they want to see is all the terrible things she has done, so they can justify their thirst for an execution.

You can call it generalization, I call it how I see it.


you should google how many people was put to death, only to be proven innocent later after DNA testings
or people who was imprisoned for 50 something years because everyone thought he did it, because of one "fake" witness, who made it up.

should we just start convicting people based on people's speculations and feelings?

 

[cwstjdenobs]

Too much media attention from the start, and too many gut reactions in this thread. And TBH with the instructions given by the judge, and the very high price of a wrong verdict, the jurors jurors had no real choice in the matter.

What's funny, is she will now be making so much more money then all of us (assuming she agrees). Vivid (Adult Video contract) offered her a job. And this isn't a small time business. They've been the contractors of Jenna Jameson and Briana Banks, so this is pretty much a kick in the balls for everyone that she is getting offered a job.

I didn't know about the Vivid contract offer (not a fan of pron in the slightest), but that is almost exactly what I was going to say.

 

[ShadowSoldier]

Too much media attention from the start, and too many gut reactions in this thread. And TBH with the instructions given by the judge, and the very high price of a wrong verdict, the jurors jurors had no real choice in the matter.

What's funny, is she will now be making so much more money then all of us (assuming she agrees). Vivid (Adult Video contract) offered her a job. And this isn't a small time business. They've been the contractors of Jenna Jameson and Briana Banks, so this is pretty much a kick in the balls for everyone that she is getting offered a job.

I didn't know about the Vivid contract offer (not a fan of pron in the slightest), but that is almost exactly what I was going to say.

I just googled, within a day, they took the offer back.

 

[gloweyjoey]

You're simply generalizing at this point.
I think you are also confused between people who want to see a conviction as opposed to people who want to see a punishment. We know SOMETHING happend to this almost three year old girl and her mother was the last person to be seen with.

If the little girl did indeed die on accident, she needs to be held responsible for not telling anyone for 31 days, dumping the body, and lying repeatedly to officers and she needs to be held responsible for all the time, effort and money that was used in the search efforts to find this little girl that she said herself she still believed to be alive but died in an accident and she bagged up the body and dumped it.

I will agree with you though, there are a lot of people who are just hyped up on pictures and videos of this little girl and don't know much of anything about the case and didn't until last month. I guarantee you, not everyone that wanted to see a conviction, not just a capital murder conviction, is one of these people.

"IF" the little girl did indeed die.

you yourself don't know for sure, why else would you use "If".
and that's my point, no one knows what happened. It's all speculations, and a bunch of I think this happened, I think that happened, blah, blah, blah.

should we just start convicting people based on people's speculations and feelings?

and to see so many people who lives thousands of miles away, who knows nothing about what happened (other than what they hear from nancy grace)
demanding the death of a women they know nothing about (other than what they see on TV).
sure you see all the bad crap she does but no one seems to give a shit about any thing good she might had done (if any) because all they want to see is all the terrible things she has done, so they can justify their thirst for an execution.

You can call it generalization, I call it how I see it.


you should google how many people was put to death, only to be proven innocent later after DNA testings
or people who was imprisoned for 50 something years because everyone thought he did it, because of one "fake" witness, who made it up.

should we just start convicting people based on people's speculations and feelings?

I was never saying I knew what happened and I was never saying I wanted her to get a capital murder conviction.

I say IF she died on accident, because THAT was the theory that the defense stuck to, that she drowned in the pool and her dad helped her cover it up. It was an accident, she covered it up. So i said IF it was indeed an accident, and she indeed covered it up she should still be held responsible for it, and that does not mean she should be put to death.

Again, the accident theory was used by her defense counsel. So if it was an accident she knew her daughter was dead, and lied about it and took everyone on a wild goose chase and wasted thousands of dollars worth of search efforts and thats OK to do? No, its not, and you know for damn sure the state is going to be looking for some money out of her.

 

[godreborn]

case and point: y would u lie to police unless u had something to hide? plus, her lack of empathy for her missing child says more than evidence, direct or otherwise, ever could. the jurors must have been riding the short bus to the courthouse. and, the state must have spent a fortune hiring people to feed and cloth them each day. u could have replaced her attorney with a cabbage and the outcome would have been the same.

 

[spinal_cord]

case and point: y would u lie to police unless u had something to hide? plus, her lack of empathy for her missing child says more than evidence, direct or otherwise, ever could.

Shock would be a very good reason, if your child had died in an accident, there is no way to predict how you would deal with is. Denial is one of the stages of grief, who are you to say that she was thinking rationally when she claimed her child was still alive?

That said, I personally believe that she had a huge part in the death and cover-up of her childs death, however, my previous comment stands, there was not enough evidence for a murder conviction, so they couldn't convict here.

 

[godreborn]

direct evidence doesn't matter in this case. when too many circumstances point to one direction, there's really only one answer. there have been many instances in the past in which people have even been convicted of murder without a body present. and, u can't use the SHOCK excuse considering she was stoic during the trial. people seem to believe that fingerprints r all over crime scenes which is rarely the case. there's never a smoking gun in any case like CSI would have u believe. it takes a little of everything to get the big picture. if the jury couldn't see that, I truly feel sorry for their parents raising such garbage. well, the jury will have to live with their decision. perhaps, the ones with small children should invest in the Casey Anthony Daycare service.

 

[cwstjdenobs]

there's never a smoking gun in any case like CSI would have u believe.

Actually most of the time it's pretty straight cut. Woman stood over abusive husband knife in hand shouting "I told him to stop it", lots of robberies and the local smack head tries to sell someone their own TV back, that sort of thing.

 

[Shano56]

I'm not the defendant. I'm not the victim. I'm not her friend. I'm not her family. I'm not the judge. I'm not the jury. I'm not her attorney. So why would I care? I don't think she will kill me. Why should anyone else care?

 

[JasmineJewelThie]

direct evidence doesn't matter in this case. when too many circumstances point to one direction, there's really only one answer. there have been many instances in the past in which people have even been convicted of murder without a body present. and, u can't use the SHOCK excuse considering she was stoic during the trial. people seem to believe that fingerprints r all over crime scenes which is rarely the case. there's never a smoking gun in any case like CSI would have u believe. it takes a little of everything to get the big picture. if the jury couldn't see that, I truly feel sorry for their parents raising such garbage. well, the jury will have to live with their decision. perhaps, the ones with small children should invest in the Casey Anthony Daycare service.

If you take the lying out of the picture any of that "evidence" could be said about anyone in that family, but we have all been brainwashed by idiots like Nancy Grace. If you hear something enough eventually its gonna get to you. Her show was a non-stop collage of the kid smiling and looking adorable while a fat headed women shoved her unfounded opinions on the matter.

 

[nugundam0079]

She's hot as fuck though

 

[nugundam0079]

Casey Anthony man-Despite all of her grandstanding and lying

She's super hot

Mods-Fuck off

 

[Seyiji]

I thought this was a video game forum...

Don't even bother my friend. People have complained before, but the general consensus is that users can post whatever news they want (as long as it's real, not spam, duplicate, or crap), gaming related or not.

Well that is pretty fucking stupid :\