whats the difference between Bypervisor rather than ETAhen? what can bypervisor do that etahen cant that is actually useful to the end-user?
ah so bypervisor is basically faster?4.xx etahen does kstuff patching in real time which isn't as efficient as 1/2.xx kernel r/w privileges... I believe that's the difference. Both achieve similar results for end-users, I believe.
Well for one, Byepervisor is an exploit, while etahen is a program that uses an exploit. Etahen is coming to the Byepervisor exploit and will not need kstuff to function.whats the difference between Bypervisor rather than ETAhen? what can bypervisor do that etahen cant that is actually useful to the end-user?

