Biden steps down, endorses Kamala

  • Thread starter Thread starter x65943
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 44,079
  • Replies Replies 491
  • Likes Likes 9
  • Friendly reminder: The politics section is a place where a lot of differing opinions are raised. You may not like what you read here but it is someone's opinion. As long as the debate is respectful you are free to debate freely. Also, the views and opinions expressed by forum members may not necessarily reflect those of GBAtemp. Messages that the staff consider offensive or inflammatory may be removed in line with existing forum terms and conditions. Saying NO to fascists/nazis - if you are one of those, you are not welcome here
Of course you can't back up your claims. You never can.
Dude you dismiss it every time anyway what's the point when it's with you?

Trump is a felon, you disagree with this.

Trump is a rapist, you disagree with this.

Trump had an objectively abysmal response to a global pandemic, especially compared to other first world countries. You disagree with this.

Trump is a racist, you disagree with this.

Trump lost 2020, you disagree with this.

All of the above is verifiable and factual information posted directly to you in the past. There's no discussion to be had with someone who will just continue to reply with a "nuh uh" as you've been for years.
 
Dude you dismiss it every time anyway what's the point when it's with you?

Trump is a felon, you disagree with this.
Not until he's sentenced. It's also not a topic of discussion.
Trump is a rapist, you disagree with this.
Trump was found liable for sexual abuse and defamation. He's never been convicted of rape by a jury. Also not the topic of discussion.
Trump had an objectively abysmal response to a global pandemic, especially compared to other first world countries. You disagree with this.
Completely.
Trump is a racist, you disagree with this.
His black, hispanic and Asian supporters would disagree with this statement.
Trump lost 2020, you disagree with this.
Hillary lost 2016. You disagree with this? Kerry lost 2004. You disagree with this? Gore lost 2000. You disagree with this?

All elections that smooth brained leftists such as yourself claim were stolen.
All of the above is verifiable and factual information posted directly to you in the past. There's no discussion to be had with someone who will just continue to reply with a "nuh uh" as you've been for years.
Not verifiable by you though.

Now try and verify the following.

The Trump pee tape.
Russia collusion.
Video or audio of Trump calling troops suckers and losers.
Video or audio of Trump calling for people to drink bleach.
Video or audio of Trump calling all Mexicans animals.
Proof that violent crime has decreased.
Proof that FEMA is not using funds for illegal aliens.
Video proof of Trump's bloodbath comment.
The 'Very fine people' hoax.
Trump ordering the Lafayette Square protesters to be tear gassed.
The 'Dictator on day one' hoax.

There are so many others, but this is more than you can handle anyway. We all know you won't address these as I have addressed yours.
 
The Trump pee tape.
Russia collusion.
I dunno that anyone really took the pee tape seriously other than you thinking we did. Russian collusion is inconclusive at best but interference has been confirmed per the investigation.

Video or audio of Trump calling troops suckers and losers.
Video or audio of Trump calling for people to drink bleach.
Video or audio of Trump calling all Mexicans animals.
Proof that violent crime has decreased.
Proof that FEMA is not using funds for illegal aliens.
Video proof of Trump's bloodbath comment.
The 'Very fine people' hoax.
Trump ordering the Lafayette Square protesters to be tear gassed.
The 'Dictator on day one' hoax.

Now the rest of all this, is easily accessible and not out of context.

But as I predicted you already dismissed the first points again and posted stuff that's long been proven to be true and you're claiming they aren't.

This is because again, it's not possible to have a reasonable or intelligent discussion with you on this because you continue to demonstrate you're an unreasonable and intelligent person who continues to believe conspiracies, are low information, and suffer from TDS because you somehow still support him after it's been proven he's behind various wrongdoings.
Post automatically merged:

Hillary lost 2016. You disagree with this?

No. Weird deflection. The people rejected Trump though.

Kerry lost 2004. You disagree with this?
No, he won the EC.

Gore lost 2000. You disagree with this?
This one is legitimately questionable. Gore won the people's vote and a Florida recount was blocked. That and the butterfly ballots. Bush was awarded the Florida EC votes by a conservative supreme court which was an unprecedented act.
 
Last edited by SeltzerMist,
  • Like
Reactions: KingVamp
Wow the amount of Cope by TraderPatTX is just... quite about right.
This one is legitimately questionable. Gore won the people's vote and a Florida recount was blocked. That and the butterfly ballots. Bush was awarded the Florida EC votes by a conservative supreme court which was an unprecedented act.
and technically never meant to be repeated but apparently conservative SCOTUS has a tendency to interfere where it shouldn't.
 
I dunno that anyone really took the pee tape seriously other than you thinking we did. Russian collusion is inconclusive at best but interference has been confirmed per the investigation.
Y'all took that pee tape like it was God's Word. You can't gaslight me, son. If there was any Russian collusion at all, then Jack Smith would have indicted him for it. Since that never happened, you memory hole the entire thing like it was no big deal.
Now the rest of all this, is easily accessible and not out of context.

But as I predicted you already dismissed the first points again and posted stuff that's long been proven to be true and you're claiming they aren't.

This is because again, it's not possible to have a reasonable or intelligent discussion with you on this because you continue to demonstrate you're an unreasonable and intelligent person who continues to believe conspiracies, are low information, and suffer from TDS because you somehow still support him after it's been proven he's behind various wrongdoings.
Post automatically merged:
You can't prove any of them, which is why you gave this long, Kamala-like answer that means nothing. If you can't prove these BlueAnon conspiracies, then it's a complete waste of time talking to you.
No. Weird deflection. The people rejected Trump though.
She disagrees vehemently to this day.
No, he won the EC.
The EC shows that Kerry lost.
1729467774838.png

This one is legitimately questionable. Gore won the people's vote and a Florida recount was blocked. That and the butterfly ballots. Bush was awarded the Florida EC votes by a conservative supreme court which was an unprecedented act.
Every new court decision is unprecedented you fool. It literally sets precedent. OMFG, I can't believe I have to explain this. You really are a tween girl, aren't you?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Dark_Ansem
Last edited by SeltzerMist,
  • Like
Reactions: Dark_Ansem
Not until he's sentenced. It's also not a topic of discussion.

Trump was found liable for sexual abuse and defamation. He's never been convicted of rape by a jury. Also not the topic of discussion.

Completely.

His black, hispanic and Asian supporters would disagree with this statement.

Hillary lost 2016. You disagree with this? Kerry lost 2004. You disagree with this? Gore lost 2000. You disagree with this?

All elections that smooth brained leftists such as yourself claim were stolen.

Not verifiable by you though.

Now try and verify the following.

The Trump pee tape.
Russia collusion.
Video or audio of Trump calling troops suckers and losers.
Video or audio of Trump calling for people to drink bleach.
Video or audio of Trump calling all Mexicans animals.
Proof that violent crime has decreased.
Proof that FEMA is not using funds for illegal aliens.
Video proof of Trump's bloodbath comment.
The 'Very fine people' hoax.
Trump ordering the Lafayette Square protesters to be tear gassed.
The 'Dictator on day one' hoax.

There are so many others, but this is more than you can handle anyway. We all know you won't address these as I have addressed yours.
I just want to say I appreciate someone who genuinely follows the news and not just the rage bait the MSM churns out. Even though your arguments fall on deaf ears and smug faces, there are others who recognize what's going on.
Post automatically merged:

The interview where basically everyone except the trump kool aid recognised she crushed Brett and put him in his place so bad that he had to apologise the following day?
God you're insufferable. Did you even watch it? I already listed some of my points above. The woman was flailing the entire time and her handlers cut the interview short.
Post automatically merged:

Also, "basically everyone" -- I remember learning in 4th grade English class that you can't meaningfully justify a statement with "nuh-uh!"
 
God you're insufferable. Did you even watch it? I already listed some of my points above.
And they are utter nonsense.

I just want to say I appreciate someone who genuinely follows the news and not just the rage bait the MSM churns o
You mean another one in the cult like you obviously.

The woman was flailing the entire time and her handlers cut the interview short.
Prove it.

Also, "basically everyone" -- I remember learning in 4th grade English class that you can't meaningfully justify a statement with "nuh-uh!"
Big talk from someone whose only evidence is Xitter.
 
And they are utter nonsense.


You mean another one in the cult like you obviously.


Prove it.


Big talk from someone whose only evidence is Xitter.
You aren't willing to listen to another poster here, I'm not wasting my time citing anything; you've already decided any evidence I share is faulty by virtue of "being in a cult". I feel sorry for you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TraderPatTX

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum