Homebrew ARM9Loader -- Technical Details and Discussion

[jon2491]

no, it's included on purpose, also it says in the instructions "with the provided" meaning the one provided in the zip

Oh ok I read it wrong. Thank you.

 

[Audioboxer]

it's named arm9loaderhax.bin, so just copy it and boot the console, you'll be greeted with a menu, just follow the instructions there and you'll be good to go

Thanks that seemed to have worked. I just renamed installer.bin to arm9loaderhax.bin.

Now I don't need to learn how to compile or bug other members to compile

 

[Nikolay]

it's named arm9loaderhax.bin, so just copy it and boot the console, you'll be greeted with a menu, just follow the instructions there and you'll be good to go

It's called installer.bin in the archive, I assume we're supposed to rename it to arm9loaderhax?

 

[Audioboxer]

It's called installer.bin in the archive, I assume we're supposed to rename it to arm9loaderhax?

Yes that worked for me.

 

[dark_samus3]

Thanks that seemed to have worked. I just renamed installer.bin to arm9loaderhax.bin.

Now I don't need to learn how to compile or bug other members to compile

It's called installer.bin in the archive, I assume we're supposed to rename it to arm9loaderhax?

oops, I had originally named it arm9loaderhax, but I had to recompile for some small changes and forgot to rename it, so yes should be arm9loaderhax.bin

 

[CreAtor135]

no, it's included on purpose, also it says in the instructions "with the provided" meaning the one provided in the zip

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------


booting CFW and other arm9 payloads on boot, automatically, waaaay faster than menuhax

Well that sounds great! Menuhax bootrate and I don't get along well, hehe..
So after I have OTP, how would I go about achieving this?

 

[Ekaitz]

oops, I had originally named it arm9loaderhax, but I had to recompile for some small changes and forgot to rename it, so yes should be arm9loaderhax.bin

It does not boot at all for me... huh.

I renamed it to arm9loaderhax.bin and copy the two files on my µSD. Any idea?

 

[dark_samus3]

It does not boot at all for me... huh.

I renamed it to arm9loaderhax.bin and copy the two files on my µSD. Any idea?

hmm, not sure, should work and have screen init (if you didn't already)... try again?

 

[DigitalJosee]

It does not boot at all for me... huh.

I renamed it to arm9loaderhax.bin and copy the two files on my µSD. Any idea?

Are you using lastest AuRei WITH an splash.bin in rei folder?

 

[Dentora]

Samus, Which way would you recommend installing it just off a complied installer off your github repo or use the original delebile installer and use your new tool? or will it not matter which way? Just reflashed a clean SysNand before you released the new installer to update it cleanly on 9.2.

EDIT: Thanks for your reply and your guys work on this!

 

[dark_samus3]

Samus, Which way would you recommend installing it just off a complied installer off your github repo or use the original delebile installer and use your new tool? or will it not matter which way? Just reflashed a clean SysNand before your released the new installer to update it cleanly on 9.2.

Well if you don't have an existing install just compiling my repo and using the installer in there is fine

 

[Ekaitz]

Didn't tell anything, sorry guys, it works well, I was just messing things with the splash screen. (Even if I think I already had the screen_init thing)

Works well, good job.

 

[Audioboxer]

It does not boot at all for me... huh.

I renamed it to arm9loaderhax.bin and copy the two files on my µSD. Any idea?

Definitely works, I've just used it.

Are you using lastest AuRei WITH an splash.bin in rei folder?

Splash.bin isn't needed to run it. Although just to confirm I copied over splash.bin after running the installer and the image appears on boot now! So the installer works great.

 

[Yudowat]

oops, I had originally named it arm9loaderhax, but I had to recompile for some small changes and forgot to rename it, so yes should be arm9loaderhax.bin

we dont need to keep stage0x5C000 on the SD do we? Im assuming no but i dont want to mess anything up haha

 

[DigitalJosee]

Definitely works, I've just used it.



Splash.bin isn't needed to run it. Although just to confirm I copied over splash.bin after running the installer and the image appears on boot now! So the installer works great.

Sorry, I misread his post.
He can't run the installer, I through he boot wasn't showing

 

[dark_samus3]

we dont need to keep stage0x5C000 on the SD do we? Im assuming no but i dont want to mess anything up haha

no you don't need to keep it on after installation

 

[Audioboxer]

Just to confirm this as well, Decrypt9 on boot works great https://mega.nz/#!yEoAzAqD!6bA4PefqiBkCr1UYPKYp8vpfE5DKpCj_0p_zpJqpUZc

No need for me to keep emunand around now. Up next a bootmanager would be good to point to different bin files to prevent having to remove sdcard and juggle different ones. Minor issue just now though.

 

[dark_samus3]

Just to confirm this as well, Decrypt9 on boot works great https://mega.nz/#!yEoAzAqD!6bA4PefqiBkCr1UYPKYp8vpfE5DKpCj_0p_zpJqpUZc

No need for me to keep emunand around now. Up next a bootmanager would be good to point to different bin files to prevent having to remove sdcard and juggle different ones. Minor issue just now though.

There's already a boot manager....

 

[Audioboxer]

There's already a boot manager....

Really? Awesome. Sorry I missed it.

 

[dark_samus3]

Really? Awesome. Sorry I missed it.

it's posted in this thread (not that it does much good haha, this thread things get buried fast)