Oh ok I read it wrong. Thank you.no, it's included on purpose, also it says in the instructions "with the provided" meaning the one provided in the zip
Oh ok I read it wrong. Thank you.no, it's included on purpose, also it says in the instructions "with the provided" meaning the one provided in the zip
it's named arm9loaderhax.bin, so just copy it and boot the console, you'll be greeted with a menu, just follow the instructions there and you'll be good to go
It's called installer.bin in the archive, I assume we're supposed to rename it to arm9loaderhax?it's named arm9loaderhax.bin, so just copy it and boot the console, you'll be greeted with a menu, just follow the instructions there and you'll be good to go
It's called installer.bin in the archive, I assume we're supposed to rename it to arm9loaderhax?
Thanks that seemed to have worked. I just renamed installer.bin to arm9loaderhax.bin.
Now I don't need to learn how to compile or bug other members to compile
It's called installer.bin in the archive, I assume we're supposed to rename it to arm9loaderhax?
Well that sounds great! Menuhax bootrate and I don't get along well, hehe..no, it's included on purpose, also it says in the instructions "with the provided" meaning the one provided in the zip
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
booting CFW and other arm9 payloads on boot, automatically, waaaay faster than menuhax
oops, I had originally named it arm9loaderhax, but I had to recompile for some small changes and forgot to rename it, so yes should be arm9loaderhax.bin
hmm, not sure, should work and have screen init (if you didn't already)... try again?It does not boot at all for me... huh.
I renamed it to arm9loaderhax.bin and copy the two files on my µSD. Any idea?
Are you using lastest AuRei WITH an splash.bin in rei folder?It does not boot at all for me... huh.
I renamed it to arm9loaderhax.bin and copy the two files on my µSD. Any idea?
Well if you don't have an existing install just compiling my repo and using the installer in there is fineSamus, Which way would you recommend installing it just off a complied installer off your github repo or use the original delebile installer and use your new tool? or will it not matter which way? Just reflashed a clean SysNand before your released the new installer to update it cleanly on 9.2.
It does not boot at all for me... huh.
I renamed it to arm9loaderhax.bin and copy the two files on my µSD. Any idea?
Are you using lastest AuRei WITH an splash.bin in rei folder?
we dont need to keep stage0x5C000 on the SD do we? Im assuming no but i dont want to mess anything up hahaoops, I had originally named it arm9loaderhax, but I had to recompile for some small changes and forgot to rename it, so yes should be arm9loaderhax.bin
Sorry, I misread his post.Definitely works, I've just used it.
Splash.bin isn't needed to run it. Although just to confirm I copied over splash.bin after running the installer and the image appears on boot now! So the installer works great.
no you don't need to keep it on after installationwe dont need to keep stage0x5C000 on the SD do we? Im assuming no but i dont want to mess anything up haha
There's already a boot manager....Just to confirm this as well, Decrypt9 on boot works great https://mega.nz/#!yEoAzAqD!6bA4PefqiBkCr1UYPKYp8vpfE5DKpCj_0p_zpJqpUZc
No need for me to keep emunand around now. Up next a bootmanager would be good to point to different bin files to prevent having to remove sdcard and juggle different ones. Minor issue just now though.
There's already a boot manager....
it's posted in this thread (not that it does much good haha, this thread things get buried fast)Really? Awesome. Sorry I missed it.