Hello i have emunand and now i have recopy all the rei files and now it works i can boot directly into emunand now i have to wait for SysNAND payload
Yeah If you had emunand from the start it would work. Issue is I have no emunand! But I'm glad to hear your 3DS is back up and running.
We were brick buddies for a while lol.
I do not know if you had already found it but i found an a9lh.bin for AuReiNand http://gbatemp.net/threads/source-release-reinand-n3ds-cfw.394309/page-196#post-6083433
Yeah I was using it. Failed to get it booting into sysnand last night, but I'll try again today.
You still need the rei folder on sd root with firmware.bin in it of course.
Yeah I used rei-N3DS from Aurora (renamed to rei of course), and firmware.bin from latest official Rei build. Think it might be the firmware.bin that is wrong. Don't I need a specific one for FW 9.2? Can't remember 100% as I've been using emunand 10.x for ages.
Not sure. i just used the firmware.bin from the aurora build.
Aurora build doesn't come with it as standard (https://github.com/AuroraWright/AuReiNand/releases). I'll test a couple of firmware.bin files and one should work.
Slight technical question, and a noob one, I'm pretty sure I know the answer though. Nintendo can't force this hack out of our sysnand can they? With something like a FW update? I know a sysnand restore can remove the loader, but Nintendos FW update process cannot? Seeing as Shadow is on 10.5 on sysnand it seems I do already have this answer.
If you stick with an emuNAND solution, then probably not. However, if you opt to go the sysNAND CFW route (like most probably will), I guess they could maybe try to look for it and remove it, but would it really be worth their time? I doubt CFW users are so numerous that we really pose a huge problem compared to the amount of PSP CFW users there were.
Updating via system settings WILL atm brick your system.
How I did it was... update with 10.5 cia's MINUS the native firm one...with sysupdater cia.
then eshop was bitching at me about updating so i THEN installed the native firm cia with devmenu.
fully functioning sysnand 10.5 with a9lh n3ds is the result.
True. I mean just wondering hypotheticals, as running a FW update is at your own peril anyway. I guess even if they do, a sysupdater style CIA update will probably be made to get onto later FWs.
Interesting to know how you done it, but without a hardmod no thanks
At least not for now till things mature with arm9.Out of interest can you restore a sysnand backup to go back down to 9.2, or do you need to use your hard mod to do so? I'd assume sysnand backup is okay.
Last edited by Audioboxer,
True. I mean just wondering hypotheticals, as running a FW update is at your own peril anyway. I guess even if they do, a sysupdater style CIA update will probably be made to get onto later FWs.
Interesting to know how you done it, but without a hardmod no thanks
Out of interest can you restore a sysnand backup to go back down to 9.2, or do you need to use your hard mod to do so? I'd assume sysnand backup is okay.
It should be okay to use Aurora's mod to boot decrypt9 and do it that way with no hardmod, but I can't promise success (never tried it..).
Yeah I don't see why not considering the arm9loader is allowing us to execute everything "prior" to boot regardless of the sysnand FW version.
I'll probably just setup an emunand again to keep my noob self in check and leave sysnand until the actual devs continue their work.
Last edited by Audioboxer,
D9 won't boot after the firm has loaded because it's too high so brahma fails and therefore D9 won't load.
D9 DOES load as arm9loaderhax.bin though but you can't see shit on screen yet obviously. lol
Audioboxer if you update through system settings it can lead to a brick, Shadow updated using Sysupdater with the Native_firm.cia removed, later he installed the native_firm but I would advise against it at the moment.
That isn't in this build as far as i know. and any builds I've compiled myself for some reason won't load. (NFI why...)
Either way if your sysnand is above 9.2 brahma will still fail... wtb brahma for >9.2 lol
Similar threads
-
AncientBoi
-
BakerMan
I rather enjoy a life of taking it easy. I haven't reached that life yet though.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
@
Jayro:
Eventhough the New 3DS XL is more powerful, I still feel like the DS Lite was a more polished system. It's a real shame that it never got an XL variant keeping the GBA slot. You'd have to go on AliExpress and buy an ML shell to give a DS phat the unofficial "DS Lite" treatment, and that's the best we'll ever get I'm afraid.+1 -
-
@
SylverReZ:
@Jayro, I don't see whats so special about the DS ML, its just a DS lite in a phat shell. At least the phat model had louder speakers, whereas the lite has a much better screen.+1 -
@
SylverReZ:
They probably said "Hey, why not we combine the two together and make a 'new' DS to sell".
-
-
-
@
Veho:
Nothing special about it other than it's more comfortable than the Lite+1
for people with beefy hands. -
-
-
-
-
-
