3DS or NGP (PSP2)

[petspaps]

looks like 3DS is an obvious winner atm, keep it comin guys.

3D gaming is still new and nintendo offering it with almost every game without an expensive TV or glasses with portability is very appealing, whereas PSP2 is kind of a mini PS3 without 3D option with a probably ill-conceived touch screen on the front. while the back touch pad may have some use, the gyroscope feature being used as a snipers rifle and for things like that maybe difficult to use if in a space where you cant move rendering its portability almost null in my view. I mean imagine ur on the train trying to control ur gunshots by having to move around or by tapping the back of ur system.

 

[SifJar]

SifJar, There's nothing old about 3DS...do your research before posting please!!!

That's my point. If you bothered to read my post, you'd have known that.

I was referring to the sub title of the thread, " Forget the old in with the new", which was referring to the 3DS.

 

[Guild McCommunist]

3D gaming is still new and nintendo offering it with almost every game without an expensive TV or glasses with portability is very appealing, whereas PSP2 is kind of a mini PS3 without 3D option with a probably ill-conceived touch screen on the front. while the back touch pad may have some use, the gyroscope feature being used as a snipers rifle and for things like that maybe difficult to use if in a space where you cant move rendering its portability almost null in my view. I mean imagine ur on the train trying to control ur gunshots by having to move around or by tapping the back of ur system.

What.

Where'd you ever pull out that example from? Maybe it was from a news article or something I didn't read. Even then, it's not like you slam on your system to activate the touchpad, a simple tap would suffice.

Also, everyone here thinks the 3D on the 3DS will blow your mind and be the best thing ever. I think it'll be there, some things will pop out, but in the end people will remember the 3D as a gimmick more than a revolution in gaming and a lot of gamers will keep that slider to Off on the 3DS most of the time.

I'll say this: 3D is just equal to upping the graphics. It adds no real gameplay revolutions outside of enhancing the eye candy. What makes 3D better than having the graphics on a PS3?

 

[SFenton]

Obviously as this is a DS/GBA/Nintendo-based forum there are going to be more votes for the 3DS, but really, I think everyone's perceptions will changed based on its hackability/ability to pirate and the core games that make its way to the system.

While I'm excited for the rebirth of Kid Icarus, right now, the 3DS just looks to me like 3D remakes. And while that may be true of the NGP- PS3 ports or "NGP Remakes"- I'm more interested in having a fresher experience. So we'll end up seeing down the line.

It's also going to depend on price. If Sony can somehow magically force the price of NGP to be $250-$300 (maybe even $350 if there's a great lineup) I'm sure a lot of people will grab the NGP. If it costs more than that, however, I'll pass for a long while. I never had much fun with my DS and I'm ready for a new PSP; I just don't have unlimited funds.

tl;dr- I pick the NGP.

 

[Jolan]

It all comes down to games.
3D ports of N64 games vs Ports of PS3 games
I dunno what to pick, both seem good.

 

[Sterling]

3D gaming is still new and nintendo offering it with almost every game without an expensive TV or glasses with portability is very appealing, whereas PSP2 is kind of a mini PS3 without 3D option with a probably ill-conceived touch screen on the front. while the back touch pad may have some use, the gyroscope feature being used as a snipers rifle and for things like that maybe difficult to use if in a space where you cant move rendering its portability almost null in my view. I mean imagine ur on the train trying to control ur gunshots by having to move around or by tapping the back of ur system.

What.

Where'd you ever pull out that example from? Maybe it was from a news article or something I didn't read. Even then, it's not like you slam on your system to activate the touchpad, a simple tap would suffice.

Also, everyone here thinks the 3D on the 3DS will blow your mind and be the best thing ever. I think it'll be there, some things will pop out, but in the end people will remember the 3D as a gimmick more than a revolution in gaming and a lot of gamers will keep that slider to Off on the 3DS most of the time.

I'll say this: 3D is just equal to upping the graphics. It adds no real gameplay revolutions outside of enhancing the eye candy. What makes 3D better than having the graphics on a PS3?

I'll agree with this, but the retail games are what will make these systems for me. Nintendo = Zelda, Mario, Starfox, Donkey Kong, etc. Sony = Uncharted, Resistance, Little Big Planet, etc. Nintendo's flagship titles have always meant more to me. Pricing is another thing, I'm sure Sony is looking at another PS3 scenario where they don't make a profit off of systems, and rely on sold games. Which they are probably looking at a BIG loss if they are going to competitively price their system. The little features for the PSP2 make it seem worthwhile. Integration is fast becoming the trend, and if Apple wises up and actually makes real games then the market will be split three ways. Everyone one will be doing the same thing, no one will be doing anything differently. This is where gimmicks such as glasses less 3D come into view. I will be buying the 3DS, and I will wait for more info on the NGP's price, specs and games before I make a decision regarding it.

 

[DryYoshi]

I will get 3DS because I pre-ordered it and the release date and stuff is announced.
I didn't hear from the PSP2/NGP all year.

 

[SFenton]

Right, you've also got to look at the first-party lineup. Admittedly, Nintendo's is much more familiar, and I enjoy all of them better overall. That said, third-party support will either be as strong as the original DS, or taper off like the Wii. Same could be said for the NGP, though at current, third party looks better for Sony than Nintendo. (Well, with the announced names. For example, Capcom's got Lost Planet on NGP while SSFIV on 3DS; simultaneously, Sony has Square Enix and an already-announced Call of Duty title).

Plus, FPSs will just handle better on NGP. This is pretty much an indisputable fact for anyone that loves shooters.

 

[steven gambee]

I'd def love to see a call of duty game on something portable that doesnt have shit graphics of difficult aim. i mean on the regular ds it was a joke, so the ngp has got me excited that there might be a cod release for it. the graphics equal to that of a ps3 and another analog stick plus touchpad? im sold. i still see myself getting the 3ds but ultimately i prefer the ngp as of npw

 

[Sterling]

Right, you've also got to look at the first-party lineup. Admittedly, Nintendo's is much more familiar, and I enjoy all of them better overall. That said, third-party support will either be as strong as the original DS, or taper off like the Wii. Same could be said for the NGP, though at current, third party looks better for Sony than Nintendo. (Well, with the announced names. For example, Capcom's got Lost Planet on NGP while SSFIV on 3DS; simultaneously, Sony has Square Enix and an already-announced Call of Duty title).

Plus, FPSs will just handle better on NGP. This is pretty much an indisputable fact for anyone that loves shooters.

Bah, touch screen aiming would be better if it was more responsive. With gyroscopes, it make gestures possible, or you could aim with the camera, or the gyroscope. Imagine, playing Call of Duty, or Medal of Honor. You see someone, and you just move your system a little bit to aim at them. When you start your game up first, you configure a window. Depending on the size of the window, it would equal the sensitivity of your turn speed.

 

[Law]

I just want to play my games with buttons, jesus christ sony what are you doing

 

[Eerpow]

The 3DS wins for me with longer battery life, 3D and the analogue and touchscreen combo which for me at least is easier than dual analogue.
Oh and the NGP is huge, 5 inches and that's just the screen, not a directly a bad thing at home but a little bothersome if your outside.
Though ill keep one eye on Sony for future new games.

 

[DeadLocked]

If i had a job right now (i'm a student) then I cannot deny I would get both, but you have to look at bang for buck when you don't have the luxury of both consoles. Both are very different but not as different as PSP and DS was.
I said PSP2. With those specs, hardware and (rumored price) of around 3DS price It outweighs 3DS IMO.
I will probably have a job in a year and a half so no problem, I will be the owner of both

 

[petspaps]

3D gaming is still new and nintendo offering it with almost every game without an expensive TV or glasses with portability is very appealing, whereas PSP2 is kind of a mini PS3 without 3D option with a probably ill-conceived touch screen on the front. while the back touch pad may have some use, the gyroscope feature being used as a snipers rifle and for things like that maybe difficult to use if in a space where you cant move rendering its portability almost null in my view. I mean imagine ur on the train trying to control ur gunshots by having to move around or by tapping the back of ur system.

What.

Where'd you ever pull out that example from? Maybe it was from a news article or something I didn't read. Even then, it's not like you slam on your system to activate the touchpad, a simple tap would suffice.

Also, everyone here thinks the 3D on the 3DS will blow your mind and be the best thing ever. I think it'll be there, some things will pop out, but in the end people will remember the 3D as a gimmick more than a revolution in gaming and a lot of gamers will keep that slider to Off on the 3DS most of the time.

I'll say this: 3D is just equal to upping the graphics. It adds no real gameplay revolutions outside of enhancing the eye candy. What makes 3D better than having the graphics on a PS3?

Id agree in that 3D is upping the graphics, but in my opinion mind blowing effects wont be released until we develop private holographic gaming so 3D does come closest to that, but thats better than just knocking off a PS3 from what could be on a 45 inch tv with hd effects to a 5 inch touch pad with downgraded and complex controls.

 

[Stevetry]

3DS is a dumb question to ask i want game PSP2 haves no game and no battery life

 

[_Chaz_]

Definitely the 3DS.

Sorry, Sony. But if you want to win my wallet, you're gonna have to try harder than graphics.

 

[Hop2089]

3DS is a dumb question to ask i want game PSP2 haves no game and no battery life

How do you know the NGP doesn't have games, have you seen the developer lineup? If not I suggest you start looking.

 

[Jolan]

3DS is a dumb question to ask i want game PSP2 haves no game and no battery life

How do you know the NGP doesn't have games, have you seen the developer lineup? If not I suggest you start looking.

Ignore him, he's a fail troll, none of his 1000 posts have any content or actual thinking behind them.

 

[how_do_i_do_that]

Who cares what the specs on either one are. They both are using carts, which means they will have flashcarts for both.

 

[mysticwaterfall]

Also, everyone here thinks the 3D on the 3DS will blow your mind and be the best thing ever. I think it'll be there, some things will pop out, but in the end people will remember the 3D as a gimmick more than a revolution in gaming and a lot of gamers will keep that slider to Off on the 3DS most of the time.

I'll say this: 3D is just equal to upping the graphics. It adds no real gameplay revolutions outside of enhancing the eye candy. What makes 3D better than having the graphics on a PS3?

Simply put, 3D is better because it is something new that hasn't been done before. That's the main selling point of the 3DS for me. If the 3DS didn't have 3D and just better graphics, I would be in no rush to get it anytime soon. Which is what I see the PSP2 as - super preatty graphics but not much new that's worth 400$.