- Joined
- Apr 4, 2009
- Messages
- 6,022
- Solutions
- 3
- Reaction score
- 898
- Trophies
- 1
- Website
- Visit site
- XP
- 1,185
- Country

In the US, the DMCA prohibits bypassing any sort of copy protection mechanism, including those in place on games consoles preventing unsigned code from running. Reverse engineering is legal, but not when it is to bypass mechanisms designed to protect copyrighted materials, such as video games. Recently it was attempted to get an exemption from the relevant section of the DMCA granted for games consoles for the purposes of homebrew, as was done with phones & jailbreaking, but the request was denied and it is still prohibited.Hmm, if Reverse Engineering is legal, and since it is legal, how does that break copy-right law? Just my question. Ill try to get funds to you guys ASAP.
DMCA only applies in the US, and I am unaware of the relevant laws in other countries, but if PayPal is based in the US (which I'm guessing it is), it falls under the jurisdiction of the DMCA. Likewise, if gshock (aka J|12) lives in the US, or if the decapping lab is situated in the US, or possibly even if donors live in the US, the DMCA has some jurisdiction over the process.
Without being a professional lawyer, I can't really say for sure exactly what the legal ramifications of the whole matter are, but my guess is that PayPal want to play it safe, in case of "guilt by association".









