How we cover AI-assisted projects - GBAtemp community check-in

GBAtemp Banner.png

It’s about that time of year again where I check in with the community to see if we can get the front page aligned with what people are interested in knowing and what people are interested in talking about. As the title might have given away, there’s one topic more hot than most at the moment, and that’s AI.

I am a C++ developer by trade, and my place of employ has just started to roll out Claude licences for those interested, so the topic of AI assisted programming is very much on my mind. I’m not just going to go out there and say “AI bad”. I don’t necessarily think it’s a productive conversation to have. The reality is that we’re going to see more projects that make use of it in some form, and some are likely to warrant attention.

Going forwards, I think it’s important that we highlight when projects we do feature make use of AI, and to what extent if such information is available. My hope is that this will strike a reasonable balance of being able to share projects that might look interesting, and giving people who want to avoid AI related projects a simple indicator.

Obviously not every project is going to be so open with their usage, and we have no intention of starting witch hunts by deep diving code and looking for em dashes in the comments. The aim here is to make whatever public information there is accessible for people reading here, and just make things a touch clearer for the people who are looking for that kind of disclaimer.

With that aside though, I am interested to know what the general consensus is among the user base. Are you open to playing ports assisted by AI if it’s the only port available, or happens to offer something unique? Do you draw the line at vibe coding, or do you avoid any project that has Claude listed as a contributor? We sadly don’t have access to polls on the front page any more, but I will make sure to keep up with any replies as they come in.
 
I'm against high component prices, high electricity prices and datacenter pollution.

Whats the point in coding an app if you code it in a way that prices your users out of a computer?

I'm OK with locally run AI as it's much less destructive, as long as it's only an aid and a human is still using their brain.
And in case you're actually curious, Here's a video on Nvidia's New Best Friend Palantir, an article on an upcoming Nashville bill & xAI's datacenter pollution rates as well as people's electricity bills rising due to nearby centers, and a video from More Perfect Union on what xAI's centers are doing to Memphis
This is literally the definition of "not my problem".

All of these are economic side effects of a bubble. Rich people will always chase big fish no matter where they lead and sometimes it gets to this point. AI, something that has quietly existed in some form for decades and only now been pushed, has absolutely nothing to do with it. Anything involving a computer, or any other non-computer machine, could have caused this. Including those render farms that artists use to make your favorite movies, and the datacenter that hosts this forum.

If you cared about the economy, you would be blaming the assholes rigging the systems in their favor.

If you cared about the environment, you would be wanting solar and nuclear plants installed.

Don't LARP with this concerned moral grandstanding if you can't even put in the effort to look honest.

An AI can keep precise record of where it acquired the data it utilized to generate something.
This is not how training data works, at least normally. I imagine it would be quite inefficient to tag all of the data this way, and pointless since the source's final contribution to the dataset wouldn't be recognizable.

If you are referring to the prompt, though, then yes.
 
Last edited by bonkmaykr,
  • Like
Reactions: phalk and Ligeia
AI is not better than him, only better than his hands. Maybe you have faster hands than him too.

PS: I said the same thing about calculator too. It sure beats counting by hand.

Post automatically merged:

I think appropriate tags to acknowledge IA use would be great. As far as I'm concerned, AI is fine as an assisting tool for a human, it's when AI replaces the human that there is a problem.
You know what happens when companies merge? They do a sandwich merge: one layer of A, one layer of B, one layer of A, and so on, stacking on top of each other. What matters most is who ends up at the very top. Everyone below will have AI reporting to humans and humans reporting to AI. If you’re not near the top, you’ll probably end up reporting to some AI boss.

If you have an AI boss, you’re somewhat lucky if you’re an average Joe. The alternative is being out on the street.
 
Last edited by TomSwitch,
AI for coding / html i dont mind since most languages are basically math and I wouldn't oppose a calculator. Just make sure that you test whatever you ship.

Ai for visual art is where I draw a line (all the puns intended).
 
  • Like
Reactions: phalk and BigOnYa
This is literally the definition of "not my problem".

All of these are economic side effects of a bubble. Rich people will always chase big fish no matter where they lead and sometimes it gets to this point. AI, something that has quietly existed in some form for decades and only now been pushed, has absolutely nothing to do with it. Anything involving a computer, or any other non-computer machine, could have caused this. Including those render farms that artists use to make your favorite movies, and the datacenter that hosts this forum.

If you cared about the economy, you would be blaming the assholes rigging the systems in their favor.

If you cared about the environment, you would be wanting solar and nuclear plants installed.

Don't LARP with this concerned moral grandstanding if you can't even put in the effort to look honest.


This is not how training data works, at least normally. I imagine it would be quite inefficient to tag all of the data this way, and pointless since the source's final contribution to the dataset wouldn't be recognizable.

If you are referring to the prompt, though, then yes.you think i didn't care before
What makes you think I haven't been doing and wanting those things until now? And what makes you think Toei Animation used a render farm to animate Transformers The Movie?
 
This is literally the definition of "not my problem".

All of these are economic side effects of a bubble. Rich people will always chase big fish no matter where they lead and sometimes it gets to this point. AI, something that has quietly existed in some form for decades and only now been pushed, has absolutely nothing to do with it. Anything involving a computer, or any other non-computer machine, could have caused this. Including those render farms that artists use to make your favorite movies, and the datacenter that hosts this forum.

If you cared about the economy, you would be blaming the assholes rigging the systems in their favor.

If you cared about the environment, you would be wanting solar and nuclear plants installed.

Don't LARP with this concerned moral grandstanding if you can't even put in the effort to look honest.
Okay. I care about what’s going on in Memphis because I’m black, myself. And I know eventually these things come for us all.
Way ahead of you on wanting solar & nuclear, and blaming the people rigging things in their favor (as shown by mentioning Nvidia & Palantir)

And that’s not what LARP means.
 
AI is not better than him, only better than his hands. Maybe you have faster hands than him too.

PS: I said the same thing about calculator too. It sure beats counting by hand.

Post automatically merged:


You know what happens when companies merge? They do a sandwich merge: one layer of A, one layer of B, one layer of A, and so on, stacking on top of each other. What matters most is who ends up at the very top. Everyone below will have AI reporting to humans and humans reporting to AI. If you’re not near the top, you’ll probably end up reporting to some AI boss.

If you have an AI boss, you’re somewhat lucky if you’re an average Joe. The alternative is being out on the street.
Every post you make seems to slide deeper and deeper into AI psychosis. That AI fiction you posted earlier was unreadable garbage. Just because an LLM can hallucinate it doesn’t make it true. You, much like Gamehopper, seemingly have no clue how this technology actually works. Get Grok’s dick out of your mouth and try reading a book.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: TomSwitch
Every post you make seems to slide deeper and deeper into AI psychosis. That AI fiction you posted earlier was unreadable garbage. Just because an LLM can hallucinate it doesn’t make it true. You, much like Gamehopper, seemingly have no clue how this technology actually works. Get Grok’s dick out of your mouth and try reading a book.
If you think pointing out where AI is heading is “AI psychosis,” that says more about your reading comprehension than my posts. You’re free to disagree with the argument, but throwing insults at Grok, books, and anatomy doesn’t magically turn your opinion into a technical rebuttal.
 
I didn't quite expect 300 replies of arguing in fairness. Some productive replies mixed in there at least.
i wish that those that complain about the usage of AI would just grow a backbone personally. constructive discussion is better than agressive discussion, and for how hard people defend AI nowadays, its basically impossible to not have at least ONE of the latter.

sometimes, I personally wished more action can be done against it, because I genuinely think those that can't make an effort to have a constructive discussion on something that's as controversial as this should get penalized in some way. as someone who doesn't vibe with ai, its here to say; it ain't going anywhere (unless it pops to which i hope), but i swear, the aggressiveness of some people are off the charts: even if I say this, you'll have one person that'll register this response as me "crying" that ai is not leaving the world. that's how bad it is, when that's not what I'm saying at all, in the slightest.


Edit: At least this ain't Twitter. Thank GOODNESS its not Twitter, even.
 
If you think pointing out where AI is heading is “AI psychosis,” that says more about your reading comprehension than my posts. You’re free to disagree with the argument, but throwing insults at Grok, books, and anatomy doesn’t magically turn your opinion into a technical rebuttal.
No my technical rebuttals that you have routinely ignored are technical rebuttals. I’m not going to provide a technical rebuttal to AI hallucinated fan fiction.
 
i wish that those that complain about the usage of AI would just grow a backbone personally. constructive discussion is better than agressive discussion, and for how hard people defend AI nowadays, its basically impossible to not have at least ONE of the latter.

sometimes, I personally wished more action can be done against it, because I genuinely think those that can't make an effort to have a constructive discussion on something that's as controversial as this should get penalized in some way. as someone who doesn't vibe with ai, its here to say; it ain't going anywhere (unless it pops to which i hope), but i swear, the aggressiveness of some people are off the charts: even if I say this, you'll have one person that'll register this response as me "crying" that ai is not leaving the world. that's how bad it is, when that's not what I'm saying at all, in the slightest.


Edit: At least this ain't Twitter. Thank GOODNESS its not Twitter, even.
I don't like what the internet is doing to hurt people either. I'm sure AI will do even worse. Not using internet is an extreme choice, same with AI in time to come. People used to talk about digital divide. In time people will be talking about AI divide.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum