[POLL] Have you had Covid-19 before?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JuanMena
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 35,533
  • Replies Replies 476
  • Likes Likes 5
  • Friendly reminder: The politics section is a place where a lot of differing opinions are raised. You may not like what you read here but it is someone's opinion. As long as the debate is respectful you are free to debate freely. Also, the views and opinions expressed by forum members may not necessarily reflect those of GBAtemp. Messages that the staff consider offensive or inflammatory may be removed in line with existing forum terms and conditions. Saying NO to fascists/nazis - if you are one of those, you are not welcome here

Have you had Covid-19?

  • No

    Votes: 159 46.2%
  • Yes

    Votes: 118 34.3%
  • Don't know / Never been tested

    Votes: 67 19.5%

  • Total voters
    344
Status
Not open for further replies.
1.) Creditible sources ( link or completely listed, No screen shots or unsourced comments, or random youtube/rumble videos from random people)
2.) not already Laughed at and Destroyed by the Medical Community
This is an outdated and an illiterate request. It is already apparent to everybody, anywhere, that the "conversation" is inorganically stifled. You want Pfizer sponsored news media to tell you bad things about Pfizer? Is this Stockholm's syndrome or is this you really looking for a way out?

 
  • Like
Reactions: Glyptofane
This is an outdated and an illiterate request. It is already apparent to everybody, anywhere, that the "conversation" is inorganically stifled. You want Pfizer sponsored news media to tell you bad things about Pfizer? Is this Stockholm's syndrome or is this you really looking for a way out?

and here come Tazber for the win… oh wait I don’t think a YouTube video from a “ex” paranoid junkie is on the same level of a Virologist … or ANY DR..

man the troll must be hard to find if your not even goin to show video of a quack “ fake” dr and go straight to comedian.
1. random youtube/rumble videos from random people)
2.) not already Laughed at and Destroyed by the Medical Community
 
Last edited by djpannda,
and here come Tazber for the win… oh wait I don’t think a YouTube video from a “ex” paranoid junkie is on the same level of a Virologist … or ANY DR..

man the troll must be hard to find if your not even goin to show video of a quack “ fake” dr and go straight to comedian.
1. random youtube/rumble videos from random people)
2.) not already Laughed at and Destroyed by the Medical Community
If crack is a language... it's not so interesting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BitMasterPlus
definitely had it once, but I think I got it much earlier on to around December 2019 before it was even known about, I was very tired for about 3 days where I just slept woke ate and went back to sleep, then I was back to normal, then I got it again (or for the first time, but this time tests existed, and it came back positive) about 3 months ago, was just tired again for a day or so, then back to normal again
 
definitely had it once, but I think I got it much earlier on to around December 2019 before it was even known about, I was very tired for about 3 days where I just slept woke ate and went back to sleep, then I was back to normal, then I got it again (or for the first time, but this time tests existed, and it came back positive) about 3 months ago, was just tired again for a day or so, then back to normal again
@WiiMiiSwitch has been looking for you for the past 8+ months.
 
Probably, my kid brings shit home all the time, including 3 times in the first 2 months of this school year. I caught one of those and have otherwise been sick one or two other times in the past 2 years, but nobody in our household ever took any COVID tests, so who knows?
 
This is an outdated and an illiterate request. It is already apparent to everybody, anywhere, that the "conversation" is inorganically stifled. You want Pfizer sponsored news media to tell you bad things about Pfizer? Is this Stockholm's syndrome or is this you really looking for a way out?


So asking for creditable sources is outdated?
 
  • Like
Reactions: KingVamp and Lacius
So asking for creditable sources is outdated?

You can't ask for "creditable" sources then limit who can report on it without being a contradiction. I literally gave him an example of creditable news and he shot it down based on the reporter being having been an actor. If you don't see the problem then you maybe you are a piece of shit?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Glyptofane
Once the discussion devolves into a debate over who has the most credible sources, the conversation is over. Time to close the thread.
 
No, but I wish I had.
I actually know this feel or at least have an experience I share. Last year my wife and I got the flu and it was awful, one of the worst either of us ever had. We thought it was Covid because of how bad it was. It wasn’t Covid though, which would have been fine but we ended up missing several weeks of work that went unpaid and we had to fight tooth and nail to keep our jobs. If we had gotten Covid, that suffering would have been paid for and covered, so yeah.
You can't ask for "creditable" sources then limit who can report on it without being a contradiction. I literally gave him an example of creditable news and he shot it down based on the reporter being having been an actor. If you don't see the problem then you maybe you are a piece of shit?
You don’t even provide sources 98% of the time and then misquote the few that you do post
 
You don’t even provide sources 98% of the time and then misquote the few that you do post

Even if that were to be true, it's not even relevant to the point. If you have a problem with something I said, you are free to address it.

If you want to dismiss information on the basis that you are tired of people disagreeing with you, then you are not being rational.
 
I find it weird that Russell Brand, who is basically a socialist, is not an acceptable voice to the American left. Anyone who is dismissing him based on his past is doing themselves a disservice as he is currently one of the best comedic journalists around.
 
Even if that were to be true, it's not even relevant to the point.
Nah dude, that’s literally always been the point. You will go on for pages with out posting a single link and even act like you did. During the rare moments you do post a link, you either misquote or ignore details in the link that counter the point you are trying to make. You’ve been doing this kind of shit for a long time now. Although, at least you appear to have stopped editing people’s original posts when you reply to them or at least I’ve gotten better at ignoring that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lacius
I find it weird that Russell Brand, who is basically a socialist, is not an acceptable voice to the American left. Anyone who is dismissing him based on his past is doing themselves a disservice as he is currently one of the best comedic journalists around.

It's bizarre. But don't think about it too much. Just listen to the crack panda guy on gbatemp telling you it's not as creditable because it's on YouTube. The irony is stupifying.

Nah dude, that’s literally always been the point. You will go on for pages with out posting a single link and even act like you did. During the rare moments you do post a link, you either misquote or ignore details in the link that counter the point you are trying to make. You’ve been doing this kind of shit for a long time now. Although, at least you appear to have stopped editing people’s original posts when you reply to them or at least I’ve gotten better at ignoring that.

If you want to address the substance of an argument, it would do you better to address the argument rather than turn try to make me feel ashamed for having an opinion. When I tell you what I believe and what I think, it doesn't always need to be sourced because I'm not trying to tell you what you should think. I'm saying what I think. If you want to attack my character instead of addressing specific things that you desire a source for, that's just you being a dick. If you want to make claims that the vaccine is safe and effective without including the 100s of pages of subtext that qualifies the claim in its specific constraints, I'd be inclined to think you are marketing as opposed to presenting "the science".

In my country, there is more evidence that I will be more likely to suffer if I join the infinite vaccine protocol than if I were to not. I'm sorry, but not sorry, that your statistics don't translate well over here. I won't accept someone telling me that my chances of dying are many times greater if I don't get vaccinated when it simply isn't true. Some idiot playing doctor on gbatemp should be held accountable for his shitty and unsolicited medical "advice".
 
  • Haha
Reactions: The Catboy
Status
Not open for further replies.

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum