The baker thing I still don't think as clear cut as you want to have it there. The "not entitled to my action" concept is persuasive.
And yes biology is a thing. Babies show preferences in toys long before they internalise misogyny (they tend not to have language by the points it is measurable). Strength and size are generally an advantage in the trades and guess where you find that. Do you want to bet on what sex prefers comfort more than the other? I am sure "know your place/role" robbed us of some fantastic women builders/scientists/engineers throughout history and crying shame really. To ignore the effects of biology in disproportionately favouring people to have skills in relevant fields... nuts.
On conversion therapy. Brainwashing, as in the best case, is fine. No real difference to being hypnotised to be more assertive, confident... or whatever other nonsense they hire life coaches for, even if it is as effective (which is to say it is not).
"If a person is LGBTQ+ in some form, it is not their job to change that, nor is it anyone else's RIGHT to try to change them"
Except it quite literally would be their job (would have thought it in the definition). Right to try... no but someone could ask to have it attempted for them. I get asked plenty of things that "physics says no" but they can still ask.
On antivaxxers. I would have to say "my body, my rules" does have to apply even if you are being a moron still. Sucks but if we are going to the free society then toleration of morons at some level gets to happen.
On asexuality. If this is supposed to be the mighty law passing for the ages (there are a few types of law, that, sort a very specific problem now and probably have to be changed later or expanded to cover the whole set and useless) then that would appear to be an oversight. Given the dubious logic of the rest then I would also ponder if "single income means you can't afford as much house" is a thing they might bring up even if it is silly/obvious.
Pay gap (which is a different notion to wage gap) is very much a choice. Take time off to have kids, can't be arsed to compete with those putting in 100 hours a week/all the overtime, can't be bothered to take the hard projects and whatnot, do huggy feely courses rather than hard graft fields, and you fall behind. I am all for it (work-life balance for me says you can keep your work and you are a fool if you go all in for it -- work to live, don't live to work) but in the end the results are what they are. Every time I go drilling down into things here then "because tits" is not a factor.
https://freakonomics.com/podcast/th...der-pay-gap-a-new-freakonomics-radio-podcast/ serves as a nice intro for that one.