Joe Biden is now officially the 46th President of the United States of America

  • Thread starter Thread starter Darth Meteos
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 310,132
  • Replies Replies 4,364
  • Likes Likes 4
  • Friendly reminder: The politics section is a place where a lot of differing opinions are raised. You may not like what you read here but it is someone's opinion. As long as the debate is respectful you are free to debate freely. Also, the views and opinions expressed by forum members may not necessarily reflect those of GBAtemp. Messages that the staff consider offensive or inflammatory may be removed in line with existing forum terms and conditions. Saying NO to fascists/nazis - if you are one of those, you are not welcome here

Should this thread be locked?

  • Yes

    Votes: 27 64.3%
  • No

    Votes: 15 35.7%

  • Total voters
    42
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Man literally says "I don't know what im signing"

You: bro theres no proof bro where's the evidence bro? You got a peer study to show he doesn't know what he's signing? Evidence? Where's your proof though other than he literally said it?"
 
The paper votes generated by the machines were hand-counted, and the results comported with what the machine votes tallied. There was no fraud.

https://www.factcheck.org/2020/12/audit-in-michigan-county-refutes-dominion-conspiracy-theory/

https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-afs:Content:9847904839
Again, counting the print-outs was not what was requested. What the Republicans wanted to see was the data directly on the machines as compared to the data on the print-outs. Counting the same data twice obviously gave the same result twice. It was a huge waste of everyone's time. As I said though, that's inconsequential now since a new president was already inaugurated.

Man literally says "I don't know what im signing"

You: bro theres no proof bro where's the evidence bro? You got a peer study to show he doesn't know what he's signing? Evidence? Where's your proof though other than he literally said it?"
What he actually said was "Kamala put off signing, huh?" in reference to the fact that he was the first to sign the document. You can clearly hear the "huh" at the end, although the man does have a tendency to mumble in an incomprehensible manner.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wartutor
Man literally says "I don't know what im signing"

You: bro theres no proof bro where's the evidence bro? You got a peer study to show he doesn't know what he's signing? Evidence? Where's your proof though other than he literally said it?"
The time to believe something is when there's evidence, and Joe Biden didn't claim to not know what he was signing.

Again, counting the print-outs was not what was requested. What the Republicans wanted to see was the data directly on the machines as compared to the data on the print-outs. Counting the same data twice obviously gave the same result twice. It was a huge waste of everyone's time. As I said though, that's inconsequential now since a new president was already inaugurated.

What he actually said was "Kamala put off signing, huh?" in reference to the fact that he was the first to sign the document. You can clearly hear the "huh" at the end, although the man does have a tendency to mumble in an incomprehensible manner.
You don't seem to understand that the machine votes were counted the first time, and the printouts were counted during the audits.
 
The time to believe something is when there's evidence, and Joe Biden didn't claim to not know what he was signing.

You don't seem to understand that the machine votes were counted the first time, and the printouts were counted during the audits.
Oh, I fully understand the procedure, I just considered the audit somewhat inadequate. In my opinion all of this stuff should be running on open source code and the anonymised results should be public for anyone with doubts to see. That's neither here nor there though, election procedures are up to individual states, that's their business.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wartutor
Accusations of voter fraud are a symptom of a greater phenomenon. These are people who exist outside established reality. Warped by such extreme social media misinformation, they may very well genuinely believe Biden is not in office.

Or that Russia appointed Trump for 4 years.
 
Yes it is.
I am likely going to have criticisms of Biden over the next four years. He will definitely make a lot of gaffes over the next four years. This is not one of them. He did not say he didn't know what he was signing. Read the posts above.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

Or that Russia appointed Trump for 4 years.
Russia did not appoint Trump. However, Russia demonstrably and illegally meddled in the 2016 election to boost Trump and hurt Clinton, and considering the margin in 2016, it very possibly tipped the election.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_interference_in_the_2016_United_States_elections
 
Russia interference had no wide spread effect on the 2016 US presidential election.
There is evidence Russian interference did indeed have a widespread effect on the 2016 election. Whether it tipped the election is something we may never know for sure, but it very possibly did.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum