Main thing is "where is my $1600". If your going to promise to pay for votes than better be punctual when doing so. Fuck this other dumb shit and quit goin straight to giving China what they want. China's little bitch all over again.
or you know, just don't give two shits about politics since non of them are worthy to run this country.It must be nice having the kind of privilege that allows for a "lax laughable response" to politics.
all over again? We have been chinas bitch for decades because of the money that is owed to them. No one has once pulled us from that debt.Main thing is "where is my $1600". If your going to promise to pay for votes than better be punctual when doing so. Fuck this other dumb shit and quit goin straight to giving China what they want. China's little bitch all over again.
You dont understand how that works, do you boy?all over again? We have been chinas bitch for decades because of the money that is owed to them. No one has once pulled us from that debt.
Sounds like a load of shit to me.I heard the AOC woman wants 're-education' programs to be set up in schools to 'de-radicalise' political beliefs that do no agree with the governments.
Does it? Or is it a few lunatics?the USA population has a serious racist problem
If it were just a few lunatics, I wouldn't have mentioned it. But now I think of it: I've used the wrong word. That should be a xenophobic problem rather than a racist one. And that's actually a much worse problem. I can rather easily point at the police brutality and say "well...those people just don't like black people" but that's creating a debate that's not digging deep enough. It's not "just" the discrimination of black people in jobs, inequal wealth and harsher treatment by the police (though each of these are important problems to deal with). It's basically the treatment of...well..."everyone not us".Does it? Or is it a few lunatics?
- There is no point, where a countries 'debt' becomes "too high" - as defined by any metric.
Yes, but not if you can convince the debtors to still stick with you. Japan, or US WW2 bonds - as a rough example.You have to service the debt with tax income, in that regard debt can be too high.
But the UN, WHO and the EU are organisations that are just as white as Trump's base, but none of those guys as much as blinked when Trump abandoned them, even if they were allies for decades before.
Yes, but not if you can convince the debtors to still stick with you.
Yes to Greece, but Greece is not structurally relevant (except for being a glacee (might have the wrong word here, green area with no trees, so you see the 'enemy' coming, in battle ).You convince them by paying interest, as soon as you can't then it's difficult to convince them.
This is what happened to Greece.
Yes to Greece, but Greece is not structurally relevant
I agree, but we were talking 'when will the US default' categories.It's a small country, but that just means they hit the limit earlier.
I agree, but we were talking 'when will the US default' categories.
(Part of the US housing crisis was caused by chinese money flooding the US investment market. With two little investment opportunities in the US. (The other part was boomer money.))
Yeah, but "too high" is largely debatable.I don't think it's likely, but it's possible if debt was "too high".
Yeah, but "too high" is largely debatable.
Also greece had no ability to print money - so they had no leaverage to discuss with investors, really.Well, there is a subjective figure which people say is too high when debating current tax levels required to service the debt and an objective figure where the wheels have fallen off the wagon and it is unequivocally too high.
No, no no - not blaming investors, just describing the investment climate of the time. And yes, because there was too much investment money arround (every boomer tried to get a solid investment, but also safe ), people just started to make those opportunities up.The US housing crisis was caused by fraud in the US. Money flowed in from all over the world because cdo's seemed like a good investment. It seems wrong to blame investors without blaming the multiple layers of fraud occurring.
And then *poof* - and people lost their homes and entire houses were worth nothing over night.
With the money you are able to get out of the US?
And yes, because there was too much investment money arround (every boomer tried to get a solid investment, but also safe ), people just started to make those opportunities up.
Yes, that was "streched" to 'but all house prices go up over time' - in the interest of the democratic party (Obama), because it lead to more social cohesion. (House prices where part of the financial economy at that point, so their value grew by more, than the real economy for many people, so they took out loans, and... that stimulated (prepped up) the US economy. So it was the poor man 'partaking' in the financial economies growth.)America has lots of land and cheap wooden houses that depreciate.