[POLL] 2020 U.S. Presidential Election

[KingVamp]

If only that were true. There's a political party in this country that will never let that happen since they benefit from it politically.

If the majorly of the states agree with the NPVIC, would they have a choice?

 

[Alexander1970]

I hope you are all happy with Mister Biden and wish you all the Best and good luck.

 

[notimp]

And I toast to that notion. This time without cynicism.

 

[Rail Fighter]

I hope you are all happy with Mister Biden and wish you all the Best and good luck.

 

[Alexander1970]

But the Roac....äähh the People like him.

 

[djpannda]

 

[lordofcombo]

As a middle eastern SUNIT muslim,we have a very specific take on these elections.
For us there is 2 America: internal America and Foreign America when it comes to policies.
We like the frank boldness of republicans toward us,at least when trump hates us hes honest about it.we knew he dont like us so were fine with that.But hes the worst toward hiss country;s economy.
As for democarts there is no more hypocrits than them.Both bushes and bitch boy Obama who did the most damage behind a phony smile.But when it comes to the US economy their are the best.we dont like them also for their liberal ethics {gay marriage,against death penaly,pro whatever it is}
So in a nutshell ,trump wins ,we win ,your demise.
Biden wins ,you win,our demise?
it is a paradox for us.
Note: muslim in north africa tend to hate trump ,thats because they hate the middle east and their alliance with US gov.
Last note,simpletons in the US thinks the US election is for them only.Thats a false assumption,
With a new president comes new foreign policies.Third world depends on these elections too.
Only spared peoples are BRICS countries and Europe who frankly are more interested in fightingting each other than unite lol.

* A middle eastern view of US elections*

 

[PiracyForTheMasses]

Fact-check: Raising the minimum wage generally doesn't cause people to get laid off, and it doesn't cause businesses to close. In fact, it often leads to new hiring.


Fact-check: giving homeless homes seems to be one of the most effective and persistent ways to curb homelessness.

Fact check, you have obviously never owned or ran a business. Fact check, of course increasing minimum wage increases unemployment, inflation etc. When minimum wage is increased, employers have 1 of 4 options. They can take the loss. They can reduce employment. They can pass the extra cost on to consumers. They can eliminate those positions all together and replace them with technology. Tell us the facts again about how increasing minimum wage leads to new hiring.

 

[notimp]

Fact check, you have obviously never owned or ran a business. Fact check, of course increasing minimum wage increases unemployment, inflation etc. When minimum wage is increased, employers have 1 of 4 options. They can take the loss. They can reduce employment. They can pass the extra cost on to consumers. They can eliminate those positions all together and replace them with technology. Tell us the facts again about how increasing minimum wage leads to new hiring.

Wrong. If done correctly (we are talking about minimum wage here), the amount is insignificant enough for most employers to not -

- Reduce employment (this just gets them into a downward spiral)
- Pass on extra cost to the costumer (this just prevents them from additional gains as a result of increased leasure spending, as a result of an increased minimum wage (they could gain more customers, even at the expense of their competitors).)
- Invest in automation (this has to be offset, by state incentives into job creation, with the automatically increased money from consumption taxes, otherwise many employers would do just that.)

So the point thats left is "absorb the loss" - but also offset it against other competitors, that are hit by a simillar amount, and state incentives for more investment, and more consumer demand.

So as a result the thing thats happening is, that the companies that can invest into that environment win, as their competitors might not make the cut. So as a result you have increased innovation (every dollar spent in that environment will count significantly more, than spent in other economic environments).

Over time, those effects will be eaten up by inflation. But this is about raising the floor - to provoke investment and innovation.

edit: Here: https://mises.org/library/does-minimum-wage-boost-innovation

Also, because thats the Mises Institute doing the analysis here (ultra freemarket liberals) - yes, you have to make sure that the amount of companies actually not making the cut is somewhat limited. So you cant do it if you dont expect most businessowners to be able to absorb the hit, and invest into it.

But then the issue over the past years was not that rich people were getting too little return on investment. In fact in most economies, the middle class payed for their financial speculation losses, and then they actually profited from the economic crises through increased state spending and specualtion. The main street people did not.

Well accept boomers of course whose main interest by now is, that their stockmarket portfolio does well. (As a generalized notion.) Shortly before they retire.

 

[MikaDubbz]

I can't help but enjoy the irony of watching Trump scramble to delegitimize votes in this election after he stole the last one.

 

[AkGBA]

As for democarts there is no more hypocrits than them.Both bushes and bitch boy Obama who did the most damage behind a phony smile.But when it comes to the US economy their are the best.

You are entitled to your opinion.

But please remember both Bush were republicans.

 

[D34DL1N3R]

As for democarts there is no more hypocrits than them.Both bushes and bitch boy Obama who did the most damage behind a phony smile.

You are entitled to your opinion.

But please remember both Bush were republicans.

Yeah, I was gonna say. Someones confused. LOL!

 

[UltraSUPRA]

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...ingButtons&utm_campaign=websitesharingbuttons

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

I can't help but enjoy the irony of watching Trump scramble to delegitimize votes in this election after he stole the last one.

"rushin' calloojenn"

 

[MikaDubbz]

"rushin' calloojenn"

spelling it wrong doesn't make it any less true lol

 

[notimp]

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...ingButtons&utm_campaign=websitesharingbuttons

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------


"rushin' calloojenn"

Thats Fake News. As far as anyone without just a 'shes seen it!' is proof enough for me mindset is concerned.

So please dear sir, dont post rumors that are actively spread as propaganda.

A poll watcher filmed highly suspicious activity at a vote-counting center

is exactly what you get when you tell people, before the voting day, that 'they be stealing your election' and people should come out in squads as 'pole watchers' (which they arent, but fancy being by pronouncing themselves as such) to prevent that from happening, to save your father the president. In a democracy.

 

[MikaDubbz]

Thats Fake News. As fare as anyone without just a 'shes seen it!' is proof enough mindset is concerned.

So please dear sir, dont post rumors that are actively spread as propaganda.

It doesn't even matter, Biden has 150,000 more votes than Trump in Michigan. It's been confirmed to be a fake news story (even Fox News has said as much), but even if it were real and 130,000 Biden votes weren't real, he still takes the state by 20,000 votes.

 

[UltraSUPRA]

spelling it wrong doesn't make it any less true lol

I mean it's been proven as a conspiracy made by Hillary Clinton but okay.

 

[MikaDubbz]

I mean it's been proven as a conspiracy made by Hillary Clinton but okay.

Source on that? Cuz all the news outlets have confirmed that there absolutely was Russian tinkering in the election, hell we know he was trying to get the Ukraine to interfere with this election, how anyone can believe that didn't happen is insane to me, but okay.

 

[notimp]

Source on that? Cuz all the news outlets have confirmed that there absolutely was Russian tinkering in the election, hell we know he was trying to get the Ukraine to interfere with this election, how anyone can believe that didn't happen is insane to me, but okay.

There was absolutely no proof of russian interference on the elections this time around. None

 

[MikaDubbz]

There was absolutely no proof of russian interference on the elections this time around. None.

When even Fox News reports that it happened, then I can't understand how people in his base still deny it. The most they can do is say, "Well yeah they meddled, but it wasn't to help Trump or anyone specifically." Yeah, okay.