Hacking Discussion Team Xecuter Attempted to Bribe RetroNX Developers

  • Thread starter Thread starter Huntereb
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 421,388
  • Replies Replies 941
  • Likes Likes 52
Status
Not open for further replies.
But if it was a private conversation, what the hell does it have to do with anyone else?

Maybe m4xw posted it for the drama. Who knows? If he did, then more fool everyone for taking the bait.
 
So...make 20 drama pages of nothing? you are so toxic people...it's embarrassing to read about your wrong comprehension of the real fact...
Is this thread an example of what this fabled toxicity thing is? I wouldn't have even placed this at the level of spirited discussion yet.

Anyway interesting developments these last few pages and would serve to radically alter the characterisation of events from the opening remarks and things used as the initial basis for the thread.
 
So...make 20 drama pages of nothing? you are so toxic people...it's embarrassing to read about your wrong comprehension of the real fact...

20 pages of crap, which miraculously gets turned to fact. By the great unwashed / unknowing.

Thats how history is written.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Catboy
At least a few of us managed to maintain the sanity check through this. To be honest, all you had to do was read the OP's post history and move along without giving the topic a second thought. Then again, it's always fun to experience the tribalism even within the piracy community.
 
I just don`t get it.

I come here to post new stuff in the hope people might find it useful.
And to throw rocks occasionally.

But this is the internet people. The moment you switch your computer off, it`s gone. Back to reality.

Why all the politics? People have no clue what m4xw or even TX staff are like in real life. Everyone has a persona that they choose to show. Me included.

So much toxicity posted by people behind a keyboard.

Newsflash... Some people do not have morals. Some people do steal and borrow... People lie. Get over it.

Folk have had code stolen (even me)... But no point in bitching and arguing about it. If it was that valuable, you shouldn`t have put in on Git. It should be on a DVD in a safe. Everyone isn`t nice. We don`t all bounce on rainbows. We aren`t all polite.

We all need to get a life. Me too...
 
Really now? You people believe a random user who has not posted any proof? m4xw has at least given snippets of the conversation. The chat logs dude has not provided anything. TX fanboys just trying to make it look less shady than it is.
 
Really now? You people believe a random user who has not posted any proof? m4xw has at least given snippets of the conversation. The chat logs dude has not provided anything. TX fanboys just trying to make it look less shady than it is.
The burdon of proof is on the one making the original claim, not the other way around.
Innocent until proven guilty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthDub
The point being made here is there are no heroes involved. What TX does certainly falls into the gray zone of legality (or even the illegal zone, depending on how you look at it). The issue at hand is how the people with their "homebrew" like to perpetually pretend they're honest saints with no smear on their own hands. The reality though is the following:
1.) Don't kid yourself, you're doing something that violates the TOS Nintendo set forth.
2.) You're enabling piracy just as much as TX is. Don't kid yourself into thinking just because the game is 30+ years old it's somehow not piracy.
3.) They attempt to take a moral high ground by claiming they're noble for doing X on a console, while TX is evil for doing X(1) on a console (the difference between enabling piracy of an old game VS enabling piracy of a new game).

I'm perpetually irritated by people who seem to have this nonsensical belief that just because they're "emulating" an old game, it's somehow not as evil or sinister as pirating a brand new game.

Yeah, well, at least we can play more than lousy NES games on a sub par emulator, it's cathartic to spite Nintendo for taking down ROM sites.
 
So true. It's against RetroArch's license so you may call it a "bribe" or "illegal exclusivity contract"

TX try and m4xw don't accept, so he can tell you his version. So yes, TX try to "bribe" or "illegal excluvity contract".

Download retroarch 1.7.5 for your plataform(s) and enjoy, see you all in other discussion (i expect in one with less level of toxicity).
 
Last edited by RY0M43CH1Z3N,
The claim being made here is the title of this thread, but no proof has been delivered.
lol, what do you gain from supporting this company? This is just plain sad, I had never expected that such a childish behaviour like yours would be the norm.
 
Really now? You people believe a random user who has not posted any proof? m4xw has at least given snippets of the conversation. The chat logs dude has not provided anything. TX fanboys just trying to make it look less shady than it is.
A random user who's been here 16 years...
 
Who would have guessed this thread would have been close to nothing but TX fanboys ignoring all of the facts and proof in order to defend their shitty purchase. Sad!

A random user who's been here 16 years...
No as that would be a logical fallacy. Appeal to authority. It doesn't matter who says what, proof is always needed.
 
lol, what do you gain from supporting this company? This is just plain sad, I had never expected that such a childish behaviour like yours would be the norm.
It's not about supporting any company. It's about supporting the truth.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

Who would have guessed this thread would have been close to nothing but TX fanboys ignoring all of the facts and proof in order to defend their shitty purchase. Sad!
agreed. So show us the chat logs already. not cherry pick parts of it. But i'm sure he wont do that since he's hiding his complicity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthDub and c411um
agreed. So show us the chat logs already. not cherry pick parts of it. But i'm sure he wont do that since he's hiding his complicity.
Yeah show us the chat logs of whatever that other guy said or some shit, you don't have any proof of the contrary. Why are you appealing to authority ya damn bootlicker? ;v)
 
Yeah show us the chat logs of whatever that other guy said or some shit, you don't have any proof of the contrary. Why are you appealing to authority ya damn bootlicker? ;v)
as stated already the onus of proof is on the person making the claim. I won't use ad-hominem or other fallacious arguments on you.
 
as stated already the onus of proof is on the person making the claim. I won't use ad-hominem or other fallacious arguments on you.
>I won't use fallacies!!
>Uses multiple fallacies in order to dodge valid arguments and proof
Sorry kiddo, better try harder than that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum