He could do it three ways...show your sd card root? Cant think of another way really.
1. Show the contents of SD/boot9strap
2. Show the console running Luma v7,1 (Only Sighax can)
3. Show the Luma updater v2.0 where the verified payload is "sighax"
He could do it three ways...show your sd card root? Cant think of another way really.

ah didnt know that.oh, it seems the luma updater shows alot of info, i'll just take a snapshot of that.


Sighax came out. And you can get a day one badge.Can someone give a summary of what happened



From how I understand it, Derrek's variant of SigHax can't dump boot9, boot11 or OTP like boot9strap. So why would boot9strap not be the one intended for devs?Also, regarding derrek's installer: It's intended for developers, basically. The reason Boot9strap has those rigorous safety checks is so the little kids in this scene don't brick their system. Neither derrek's sighax installer nor Boot9strap are superior - they just target different audiences is all. A developer ain't gonna use boot9strap, and a kid shouldn't be using Derrek's installer.
Because having it launch a payload from CTRNAND is effectively the same thing (everything installed to the console itself) while also allowing you to actually update the payload without reinstalling sighax every time. What if Luma accidentally pushed out an update that didn't work and someone installed it permanently using sighax? Hope they have a hardmod. Without the capability of launching a payload from SD card, you lose the brick protection that A9LH and now B9S give you, since you can always boot GodMode9 from SD and restore a NAND backup.Why did they change the implementation method from derrek - NAND to Boot9strap - SD/CTRNAND? If i understood the guide right. Boot9strap is the same as a9lh whereas only a part of the exploit gets installed into the nand/console itself and the payloads excecute separately via sd/ctr nand. Yet derrek's makes a womble jumble of exploit+payloads (a-la psp infinity cfw "perma" patch)
Those people would be silly.Because there's people that don't want to install a9lh nor b9s.

I did it, but how do you get the day one badge?Sighax came out. And you can get a day one badge.

I did it, but how do you get the day one badge?
maybe now i can fix my new 3ds in BOOTROM screen with failure
00F800EE FFFFFFFF FFFFFFFF 00000000 00000000 - NCSD header in sector 0 is corrupt (failed signature check).
right?
With a hardmod or wait until ntrboothax is released assuming you have a compatible ds flash cart (and until it is released nobody knows which ones will be compatible).
https://github.com/Normmatt/ntrcardhaxI think @Apache Thunder said in this thread the AK2i would work because it has a publicly available flashing method or something?
@Apache Thunder do you have any more details? (I love my ak2i and still use it on my 3ds to this day!)
That's exactly what it sounds like, and it's for both. Anytime you mess with the NAND you risk a brick; that's just the nature of these types of hacks. Another reason the guide suggests Boot9Strap over Sighax, with the verification checks before it installs.You risk bricking each time you write to the FIRM
This is written in the sighax faq, what does this mean, is it for a9 or b9s