Roger. First, ty for replying in a respectable manner. I know things can get hairy on here sometimes, and I appreciate you toning it down. Seriously, much appreciated.
Okay, so I was wrong. I am sorry about that. I assumed NUS decrypted content. I guess it boils down to 2 things now. 1) Is creating a program that allows users to decrypt data illegal, even though the console is doing the decrypting? Normally, decryption is behind a paywall. Doing so without paying is doing so without permission. Is that illegal? And, 2), the use of trademarked images, which can be rectified very easily and quickly.
Most major sites assume DMCA's are legit from major corporations. Sure, I'll agree to that. Is GitHub refusing to restore a DMCA'd repo after a legal ruling against Ninty's claim? If so, then I'll agree they are not doing the right thing. It's not on GitHub to research if the DMCA is legit. It's on the user to do that. Valid DCMAs also have to be responded to within 24 hours usually, so freezing is always the easiest thing to do.
The icons infringing is still legit.