no it isn't. we need an exploit into the IOSU. we already have the kernel exploit, and then, when we will find an IOSU exploit, we will use the ernel exploit to boot the iosu exploit (i think)
Ya expect like a dozen of this same comment. Great community eh? I don't know much either was curious so I popped in.
*Facepalms*
<- my phone--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
It just pisses me off that noobs like these clutter the temp with useless threads asking dumb questions like these. There is a stickied noob question thread.
Everything we have right now in the scene has been leaked dont wait for someone to release something useful
one thing is asking what is an exploit. another thing is basically saying "ehhh but it is easy you can do it this way ehhh" withouth knowing of what you are talking about
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
he ddidn't asked that
PLEASE Never ask when something will be done. "IT WILL Be DONE WHEN IT IS DONE!" That is very rude to ask about and unless your gonna contribute something to the project, there no point in asking that question, when it is done, i'm sure you will know about it.
if i understood it right,
stage1: code excecution (homebrew).
stage2: adding your OS (kernel).
stage3: cracking the faking/patching the sgnatures so that the anti pirate mechanisms wont get alarmed (backuploader/cfw).
stage4: reverse enginering all hardware drivers (as close to the way the original drivers function as it was original done just now for your own OS) (IOSU).
could be getting it wrong though, but if it's as straight forward as i understand... then hell we're not even close of getting there.
stage1: code excecution (homebrew).
stage2: adding your OS (kernel).
stage3: cracking the faking/patching the sgnatures so that the anti pirate mechanisms wont get alarmed (backuploader/cfw).
stage4: reverse enginering all hardware drivers (as close to the way the original drivers function as it was original done just now for your own OS) (IOSU).
could be getting it wrong though, but if it's as straight forward as i understand... then hell we're not even close of getting there.
Oh shit you're right now we just have to deploy the hacking algorithm and bam we got iosu
Well, a lot of stuff actually. I mean the developers spent a lot of time putting in security measures to make sure that nobody can get access to things they are not supposed to. Kernel and IOSU are completely different things.
cfw is iosu? so you mean IOSU is a preloader? sorry i can only write assembly so i don't know all the detailes i'm technician for cool installations with really old type micro-processors like from before 286 processors were born to exist.
Similar threads
-
Xdqwerty
what are you looking at? -
Psionic Roshambo
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
@
Xdqwerty:
@SylverReZ, I dislike the kind of drm where you have to play single player games online all the time bc of some verification bs+1
-
-
-
-
@
Xdqwerty:
@SylverReZ, I also heard one of the Prince of Persia games was so unfinished that it required the "24/7 online" drm so a puzzle could be done and the game could be finished. And that when the Ubisoft servers were closed the (cracked) game was impossible to finish or something like that
-
@
SylverReZ:
@Xdqwerty, That's extra scummy. Ubisoft nowadays ship out incomplete games like Skull and Bones which was being worked on for nearly a decade now.+1 -
-
-
@
Psionic Roshambo:
I like that games can be fixed after the fact, hate that it's being abused via beta tests... And DLC... I was a 7800 owner back in the day and loved Impossible Mission, turns out I couldn't beat it because it was actually impossible lol
-
@
Psionic Roshambo:
I never knew about it at the time but a fixed version was available but you had to mail in your broken copy lol
-
-
