- Joined
- Jun 4, 2015
- Messages
- 1,441
- Trophies
- 1
- Location
- Minus World
- Website
- www.youtube.com
- XP
- 2,482
- Country
I did a quick comparison of coldboot speeds between Arm9loaderhax and Menuhax:
Arm9loaderhax was able to boot into AuReiNAND in 10.56 seconds while traditional Menuhax took 25.02. That's a 58% reduction in loading time, plus 100% boot success rate whereas previously I had about a 25% chance of boot failure.
Both consoles were equipped with the exact same make and model micro SD card and while the number of installed games was slightly different, this should have a negligible impact on load times.
A9LH console:
N3DS 9.0sysNAND/10.6emuNAND
Arm9loaderhax + AuReiNAND 3.2
Menuhax console:
N3DS XL 9.2 sysNAND/10.6emuNAND
Menuhax 2 + Ctrbootmanager + ReiNAND 3.2
Arm9loaderhax was able to boot into AuReiNAND in 10.56 seconds while traditional Menuhax took 25.02. That's a 58% reduction in loading time, plus 100% boot success rate whereas previously I had about a 25% chance of boot failure.
Both consoles were equipped with the exact same make and model micro SD card and while the number of installed games was slightly different, this should have a negligible impact on load times.
A9LH console:
N3DS 9.0sysNAND/10.6emuNAND
Arm9loaderhax + AuReiNAND 3.2
Menuhax console:
N3DS XL 9.2 sysNAND/10.6emuNAND
Menuhax 2 + Ctrbootmanager + ReiNAND 3.2