So, are there still any reasons to stay under 5.3.2 ? I was staying at 4.1.0 but loadiine v3 is quite limited. Even if older firmware are assumed to be more stable, it doesnt make sense if we can only play a very limited amount of games.

Just get yourself at 5.3.2, it's more convenient for most of what is already available.So, are there still any reasons to stay under 5.3.2 ? I was staying at 4.1.0 but loadiine v3 is quite limited. Even if older firmware are assumed to be more stable, it doesnt make sense if we can only play a very limited amount of games.
Though this has already been mentioned multiple times, here's the reasons:yes it has fake all over it but they dont want to hear that
I'm curious about this, what would make launching an unsigned title cause a brick? Why wouldn't it simply refuse to start? Like on the 3DS, unsigned installed titles can be seen on the home menu, but not started at all without disabling sig checks.- If you run an installed, unsigned title after a reboot, without first launching the IOSU exploit, you can irreversibly brick your Wii U, unless you have a NAND backup from before the brick and a means of flashing it through hardware.
He said "it can", in best case scenario when a title check is failed it will crash, or refuse to run the title.I'm curious about this, what would make launching an unsigned title cause a brick? Why wouldn't it simply refuse to start? Like on the 3DS, unsigned installed titles can be seen on the home menu, but not started at all without disabling sig checks.
So, I've got good news and bad news.
The bad news is that I'm going to postpone the release again. I said this week would be a more realistic release date, but I never confirmed it would happen then. Still, it's not a huge delay and it's definitely not to wait for a new firmware update.
Like I stated before, I have the entire month of January free just to work on this and the exploit will be released and maintained before February (yes, I'm sure of that).
Now the good news, which should explain the additional delay. I need some time to pursue something I found in the MCP module. If I'm correct about this, we should be able to get a boot-time exploit. The reason for that is that the MCP module is responsible for launching "master" titles (like the PPC kernel, for example) and I found a bug that, if it turns out to be exploitable, should allow to hijack execution while MCP is still preparing to launch stuff. This means, early IOSU access and a direct boot into an exploitable environment. Not to mention that MCP is the IOSU user module with most privileges (next to BSP that is) and having access to it alone is more than enough to own the IOSU kernel at any given time.
I believe it's important to look into this because if it works, no one will have to worry about possibly bricking consoles by installing custom titles (homebrew channel, for example) and then attempting to launch them before triggering the exploit again after a fresh boot.
With that said, if this turns out to be nothing, I'll release the exploit right away.

ISOU Exploit+permanent, il doubt theres much more to achieve from an enduser point of view.Do you think that with the presence of loadiine and hykems work soon to be released , that we will ever see what failoverflow ever acheived ? meaning do you think they will ever let out what they had ? and would it be a better solution than what hykem is about to release? or would it assist and enhance in anyway ?
ISOU Exploit+permanent, il doubt theres much more to achieve from an enduser point of view.
Do you think that with the presence of loadiine and hykems work soon to be released , that we will ever see what failoverflow ever acheived ? meaning do you think they will ever let out what they had ? and would it be a better solution than what hykem is about to release? or would it assist and enhance in anyway ?
Just because they didn't release it doesn't mean it wasn't found and patched by Nintendo in a FW update since then.ah , didnt think on software revisions , good point , but as they didnt release their work i guess it wouldnt have been patched. Did they actually acheive anything more than whats due ?