This article argue that DNA acts like a computer program and that since it doesn't exist a software that wasn't designed by a programmer, the DNA must have been written by someone, that someone being God.
This is actually an interesting idea and I had to think for 20 minutes to get to a conclusion myself.
I think although the idea is good, it works on the assumption that the DNA has to have a writer. This is a natural assumption because a Programming Language or a Natural Language are very restrict about its vocabulary, semantics and syntax. You can't expect random letters to make a full comprehensible message or random commands to make a useful functioning software. This is not true for the DNA however, DNA is known to be prone to mutation and, in fact, there are bad and good mutation. In a message or a computer program, mutation is undesirable as it corrupts the meaning of the message or the function of the program.
The reason "There has never existed a computer program that wasn't designed...[whether it is] a code, or a program, or a message given through a language" is because it needs to be designed by someone. A message is only useful if it has meaning and a software is only useful if it has utility. I don't believe this is the case for the DNA though, a DNA doesn't need to have a meaning or an utility.
It doesn't mean it wasn't written by a superior intelligent being, but I argue that it could just as well be random chemicals that got combined in a way that worked and through mutation and replication managed to get more and more complex with time, coupled with Darwin's law of Evolution would make the most effective DNA combinations to be the ones that survived.
Thanks for this article, bro. It really got me thinking!