God's existence is independent of the Bible's validity. You can believe in God without following any religion (deists). And you can be religious while being an atheist (Buddhists).
Prove your claims.
2+2=4, that's universal, YET it's still possible for someone to believe otherwise. Opinions don't invalidate facts. I can't believe I even have to point this out.
Belief means an acceptance of the facts. You believe in science, because it's true. You also claim to believe in morality, so you must also think it is true. My question is what is the source of your moral beliefs?
And we know women/children are human, therefore their abuse was immoral regardless of what the perpetrators considered human.
If you do not want to participate in this discussion, why do you keep coming back just to tell the participants to stop talking?@Sicklyboy we need you here
Because it's totally offtopic and this is nothing but pages filling with you and haloman fighting at something that isn't related to OP
Why don't we have a more formal debate about morality/Gods existence, over Skype?
The arguments I'm proposing are related to the OP. I do think it's funny that Neo is scolding you for mentioning mods, yet he himself keeps threatening to "report" me (for hurting his feelings, apparently).
It is completely on-topic. Morality and the concepts of good and evil are at the heart of the basis for belief in a deity. His argument is that without the existence of a god, irrespective of whether a man believes in a god or not, that good and evil could not exist, without a basis of reference.
If you want to feel better, I reported both of you.
This topic is about God's existence, which is what I'm arguing. The Bible is a different topic.
