Emulation [RELEASE] Cemu - Wii U emulator

[RHY3756547]

Just a quick thing I noticed, in Time Trials when viewing replays you can see the ghost's character, because they are transparent and thus rendered outside the game's usual deferred shading setup. (in the few frames which actually draw)

Spoiler

 

[Kalomaze]

Can't wait to see progress on super smash bros. if it runs soon!

 

[DarkFlare69]

Can't wait to see progress on super smash bros. if it runs soon!

Probably not for quite a while

 

[Growlith1223]

Just created a video for pikmin 3(you can get farther than where i was at btw, i just couldn't remember what to do at that point lol)

 

[Kristiqn5]

Anyway to get past the "press 2!" screen on New Super Mario Bros U?

 

[MrRean]

Is it gonna be better than Cemu someday?

it already is

 

[pol40]

What ????

 

[DarkFlare69]

it already is

Are you sure? What makes it better?

 

[MrRean]

Are you sure? What makes it better?

RE'd Cemu code is a mess, if you look at it. Decaf has a waaaay much better built base, and has a more stable future ahead of it.

 

[DarkFlare69]

RE'd Cemu code is a mess, if you look at it. Decaf has a waaaay much better built base, and has a more stable future ahead of it.

Is the source released

 

[MrRean]

Nope, but you can RE it.

 

[DarkFlare69]

Nope, but you can RE it.

Fuck reverse engineering!

i will support cemu until the other emu gets better than it.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

And by that I mean more game support, faster, accurate, etc

 

[MrRean]

You all are looking for graphics and speed in an emulator, and not caring about what really makes it work better than the others.

So if you judge an emulator by being "better" in that sense, you're instantly wrong.

oh, and accurate is the exact definition of what Decaf seems to be going for. Once again, it's already better.

 

[RHY3756547]

It's simple guys, all you need to do is backdoor into the emulator and you can see all of the code. Just backdoor it. Reading x86 assembly is like child's play to a master hacker, its so much more natural than reading C. Real talk.

 

[MrRean]

The source isn't all that interesting, as I've heard. Hykem said it was rushed I think.

 

[DarkFlare69]

You all are looking for graphics and speed in an emulator, and not caring about what really makes it work better than the others.

So if you judge an emulator by being "better" in that sense, you're instantly wrong.

oh, and accurate is the exact definition of what Decaf seems to be going for. Once again, it's already better.

As long as it works, we'll be fine.

 

[MrRean]

Not quite, but okay.

 

[Growlith1223]

Not quite, but okay.

While yes Accuracy is really nice, not everyone is a TASer nor a speedrunner so it doesn't apply as much to a normal user that just wants to play a game

 

[pol40]

You all are looking for graphics and speed in an emulator, and not caring about what really makes it work better than the others.

So if you judge an emulator by being "better" in that sense, you're instantly wrong.

oh, and accurate is the exact definition of what Decaf seems to be going for. Once again, it's already better.

Good luck playing with the source code, we will playing wii u games in Cemu.

 

[Exzap]

RE'd Cemu code is a mess, if you look at it.

I'd really like to see proof for this statement. And before you point to Hykem's post, it's very vague and doesn't proof anything.

Decaf and Cemu follow the same approach to Wii U emulation where library functions and the Cafe OS kernel are HLE'd. In essence they are equally accurate, the only difference is what parts of the emulator are already implemented properly.

On a side note, it would be nice if people could drop the Decaf vs Cemu mentality. It's not a competition.