Hacking Wii U Hacking & Homebrew Discussion

[TeamScriptKiddies]

who see the 3dsNICE pastebin? another lies?
ps: i have see the wiiukey prototype, probably it works on latest fw ( if u have extract the key with lower fw). the ode productions cost is too high? idk the number of people with 3.* wiiU
http://pastebin.com/u/3DSnice

ps: not flame its not my paste...
it released a secretcode but idk what is it

Team fatal strikes again! How much you wanna bet hes behind that trolling extravaganza.....

People need to actually know what they are talking about before making such stupid false claims lol.

Also i love his awesome "copy and pasting skills," just look at "his" webkit "exploit" code XD.

What a fraud...

 

[NWPlayer123]

So it rebuilds a BRSTM to a BFSTM without quality loss?

That's the goal, yes. All they did was change some of the header sections(which is what we're trying to figure out), it's still raw ADPCM.

Team fatal strikes again! How much you wanna bet hes behind that trolling extravaganza.....

People need to actually know what they are talking about before making such stupid false claims lol.

Also i love his awesome "copy and pasting skills," just look at "his" webkit "exploit" code XD.

What a fraud...

Actually that's not FaTaL, that's some skriddy who thinks they can use buzzwords to try to fool the community (it's the equivalent of clickbait).

 

[FM360]

I'm waiting for it to be rewritten before I try anything (plus I need the codehandler source to be able to get an RPC client working)

MUST... HAVE... MAC... VERSION... OF... CAFFIINE!!! (Computer Explodes)

 

[IbbyPlays]

MUST... HAVE... MAC... VERSION... OF... CAFFIINE!!! (Computer Explodes)

THEY.. WILL... RELEASE.. THE... SOURCE!!! (Compiles Source)

 

[starerik]

That's the goal, yes. All they did was change some of the header sections(which is what we're trying to figure out), it's still raw ADPCM.

Alright. That's great.

 

[TeamScriptKiddies]

That's the goal, yes. All they did was change some of the header sections(which is what we're trying to figure out), it's still raw ADPCM.


Actually that's not FaTaL, that's some skriddy who thinks they can use buzzwords to try to fool the community (it's the equivalent of clickbait).

Same difference lol

 

[Margen67]

That's the goal, yes. All they did was change some of the header sections(which is what we're trying to figure out), it's still raw ADPCM.


Actually that's not FaTaL, that's some skriddy who thinks they can use buzzwords to try to fool the community (it's the equivalent of clickbait).

What's a skriddy

 

[TotalInsanity4]

What's a skriddy

Contraction of "script kiddy"

 

[csgolawliet]

sorry guys but i had to leave a week because of my final exams and now that im back i see a lot of progress

Sorry for the noob question, but if i understood it well, do they have an exploit already?

 

[TotalInsanity4]

sorry guys but i had to leave a week because of my final exams and now that im back i see a lot of progress

Sorry for the noob question, but if i understood it well, do they have an exploit already?

Not quite, but they're close

 

[Marionumber1]

sorry guys but i had to leave a week because of my final exams and now that im back i see a lot of progress

Sorry for the noob question, but if i understood it well, do they have an exploit already?

We have a kernel exploit that works on 4.1.0 to 5.1.0 (with a few minor issues on some versions), and should work on later versions once we have a new WebKit exploit. That's our priority at the moment.

 

[TeamScriptKiddies]

We have a kernel exploit that works on 4.1.0 to 5.1.0 (with a few minor issues on some versions), and should work on later versions once we have a new WebKit exploit. That's our priority at the moment.

MN1 et al for president of planet earth!

 

[Axido]

We have a kernel exploit that works on 4.1.0 to 5.1.0 (with a few minor issues on some versions), and should work on later versions once we have a new WebKit exploit. That's our priority at the moment.

No offense (just a question to be honest), but you have been saying "once we have a new WebKit exploit" for quite a few weeks iirc. You were pretty confident that there would be one. Can you still confirm that 5.3.2 users are safe or is there a higher possibility that there's no new WebKit exploit to be found than you originally thought?

 

[Marionumber1]

No offense (just a question to be honest), but you have been saying "once we have a new WebKit exploit" for quite a few weeks iirc. You were pretty confident that there would be one. Can you still confirm that 5.3.2 users are safe or is there a higher possibility that there's no new WebKit exploit to be found than you originally thought?

The possibility of a new exploit is as good as it's ever been. We've just been busy.

 

[typ0]

Hey NWPlayer, slightly OT but I didn't want to make a new thread for it, I read a while back about a tool that can view all the assets of a Wii U disc. Does this work with all games or is it restricted to certain versions built with an earlier SDK?

I am thinking about Mario Party 10 that has just been released. Before people start bashing this heh, I was thinking of looking through the assets to see if there is any reference to the Silver Mario Amiibo as I have seen some screenshots of the Gold Amiibo in game. It is more out of curiosity than anything else.

 

[IbbyPlays]

A sick part of me kind of want's to make a program (or pay someone else to) that takes Scala code and does this:
Scala -> JVM -> C++ -> C -> Wii U program

The main reason being that many people say that Scala is very nice.
Edit: IIRC the JNI may shorten the chain to:
Scala -> JVM -> C -> Wii U program

 

[PhyChris]

We have a kernel exploit that works on 4.1.0 to 5.1.0 (with a few minor issues on some versions), and should work on later versions once we have a new WebKit exploit. That's our priority at the moment.

why not focus on polishing 5.1.0 exploit for public and let everyone update to that FW version? save the other buggy versions for people wanting to examine the FW changes. the average user will have no use for multiple exploit versions on older FWs

 

[Marionumber1]

why not focus on polishing 5.1.0 exploit for public and let everyone update to that FW version? save the other buggy versions for people wanting to examine the FW changes. the average user will have no use for multiple exploit versions on older FWs

Why not focus on running userspace code on 5.3.2, polish the exploit for that version, and let everyone update to that firmware version? The average user will have no use for multiple exploit versions on older firmwares.

 

[nonamejohn]

Why not focus on running userspace code on 5.3.2, polish the exploit for that version, and let everyone update to that firmware version? The average user will have no use for multiple exploit versions on older firmwares.

Bingo !

 

[Xuman]

Why not focus on running userspace code on 5.3.2, polish the exploit for that version, and let everyone update to that firmware version? The average user will have no use for multiple exploit versions on older firmwares.

#rekt loljk but seriously tho, keep up the great work!