I am getting the working little by little, but it would be nice, and go a lot faster if I could get some help.
printf("Rebooting\n");
Why don't you enable "issue" function on GitHub?
I have found a fatal problem, but I can't tell you.
The problem is here.
https://github.com/Aliak/OSKA/blob/cf762f09880956f029a9aa90b718e6ee2c0b9867/oska.c#L327
Code:printf("Rebooting\n");
It's very troublesome to fix it.It's enabled now. Why was that a problem?
This is cool..but I want to ask why don't they all just cooperate? ( KARL,OSKA,PAUL and GATEWait ) that would be the best wouldn't it? tbh
INB4 Devs Biases,$$$, etc.
Buying a Gateway.Alright, real talk: I got a N3DSLL on 9.2, a copy of CN, a copy of OoT3D and a Skycard. I want emuNAND so I can get my shit off the eshop. What is my best frigging option right now?
Group? Have anyone else Aliak joined the development?
His work is great, but it won't work. It's clear that no one can do everything by himself alone.
I have enough knowledge to reverse and write codes. I can say what is wrong in the code and how to fix.I don't have the necessary knowledge, but how about you?
If KARL had been open source, companies like GW and Sky, that profit off of piracy, would be out of business the next day. Really makes me wonder if KARL devs aren't in bed with GW & Sky. You can't prevent piracy, you can only cripple capitalization of it by providing better alternatives. Kind of like legalizing marijuana
in this case though im not sure that capitalizing on it is such a bad idea, i mean i already own a GW so maybe i am bias
but it gives GW more incentive to work on new things
if we depend on scene devs doing it for free in their free time we can probably expect to wait even longer for new developments than if we are waiting for people who have financial motivation to do it
on the other hand it opens things up to more people who want to work on it rather than a small team( i assume GW is a small group of devs)