Hacking Look this NTR CFW

  • Thread starter Thread starter Timburpton
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 82,743
  • Replies Replies 261
  • Likes Likes 1
Does anyone know if it's possible to run Ninjhax on NTR CFW? Because it always hangs at 20% when trying to run the exploit for me.

I'm pretty sure online functionality is disabled to prevent people from cheating online.

No internet, no Ninjhax.
 
I'm pretty sure online functionality is disabled to prevent people from cheating online.

No internet, no Ninjhax.
Huh. Didn't know that.

Still, Ninjhax only needs Internet for installation. It should be possible to install it using a GW kernel version 2.6 or lower (as I heard that 2.7 is incompatible with Ninjhax because it's based on latest 3DS firmwares) to install it. Then after that you might be able to use it in NTR CFW. Can anyone here test this? I was never able to get Ninjhax to work, not even on the GW kernel, so I cannot check it.
 
Can anyone here confirm if this works on a 3DS that was downgraded with GW 3.0.1?
No, I'm fairly certain it requires a 4.x system and a gateway card.

It's based on an earlier version of the Gateway launcher and requires the red card to boot into emuNAND.

EDIT: Sorry, I misread your question as 'will this work on a system downgraded TO version 3.0.1

Yes, this should run fine on a system downgraded to 4.x
 
Edit: But has anyone tested if it works?

Also, can you run it on a GW upgraded to 3.0?
should work fine, if the leaked CFW works, this should work

in regards to the FPGA update, this will prompt you to "update".....and allow the card to be downgraded to work in it, but i suggest if your going to switch between this and the latest, use 2.7 instead, so you dont have to flash the FPGA everytime you switch between the 2
 
I'm just wondering. Is the NTR CFW the same as the Palantine CFW or is something different?
What Exactly is the NTR CFW?
no its a customized GW 2.2, afaik it only works with 4.x emunand, main use for me is screenshots, doesn't allow running cia files or anything like that(or at least without using the red card), and GW mode required the red card to be inserted
 
no its a customized GW 2.2, afaik it only works with 4.x emunand, main use for me is screenshots, doesn't allow running cia files or anything like that(or at least without using the red card), and GW mode required the red card to be inserted

so it's not really useful. Only for Screenshot function? No Cia install?
Would be cool if we could patch the Palantine CFW with it, but if we need a Gateway Red Card and only Screenshot Function... Useless in my opinion
 
so it's not really useful. Only for Screenshot function? No Cia install?
Would be cool if we could patch the Palantine CFW with it, but if we need a Gateway Red Card and only Screenshot Function... Useless in my opinion
very useful for people who have a gw card and want to take screen shots, you can also take screenshots of the games you own too, if you need help with the cfw you should look towards the original dev :P
 
very useful for people who have a gw card and want to take screen shots, you can also take screenshots of the games you own too, if you need help with the cfw you should look towards the original dev :P

Wait what?
How we can create Screenshots with Palantine CFW?
Can't use the NTR CFW because I don't own a Gateway :/
 
Wait what?
How we can create Screenshots with Palantine CFW?
Can't use the NTR CFW because I don't own a Gateway :/
you can use classic mode and take screenshots of your original carts in classic mode using this cfw, the other one that was leaked was made by a proper dev who had no intention of it being leaked, but it was and very few adjustments have been made to it, it was a "cfw" in its most basic form, and unless a talented dev decides to take up the project, that's pretty much all it will stay as
 
you can use classic mode and take screenshots of your original carts in classic mode using this cfw, the other one that was leaked was made by a proper dev who had no intention of it being leaked, but it was and very few adjustments have been made to it, it was a "cfw" in its most basic form, and unless a talented dev decides to take up the project, that's pretty much all it will stay as

Would be cool if someone could "combine" this two "CFWs", but for both, there's no Source :/
 
Would be cool if someone could "combine" this two "CFWs", but for both, there's no Source :/
basically all the dev's with the knowledge on how to build a good CFW have no interest in doing so, the NTR cfw is as close to a half decent cfw as we have atm, and the author has already said he has zero plans to allow piracy, he just wants a cfw for the classic mode with your own games and the gateway FW is a means to an end in that department

the leaked CFW from what i read was like a year old when it was leaked, the original dev will not be helping anyone out with it, there is a few other dev's who also have their own CFW setup's, but again there is a stern "not from us" message, personally i think the GW card is good value for money, its the best that anyone round these ways will release anyway, every time there has been an influx of users saying "sooon"....it never happens, there has been people with 4.x consoles for like 2 years now still waiting on the "promised" all the bells and whistles CFW....personally i dont see it happening for a good while still
 
Noone said it would be easy :P
nobody with any idea how to do it seems interested, and the leak of the old CFW just deterred them even more from trusting people outside their group, trust me that thing has been pulic for months now, and i havent seen a single development come for it....not even something basic like making it properly stable
 
It's been mentioned by the original devs that making it stable was the furthest thing from simple, took them months to get it booting consistently.
 
nobody with any idea how to do it seems interested, and the leak of the old CFW just deterred them even more from trusting people outside their group, trust me that thing has been pulic for months now, and i havent seen a single development come for it....not even something basic like making it properly stable

Do you mean the Palantine CFW or the NTR CFW? There's no Source for both, I think.
If PalantineCFWs source would be public, I would look into it
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum