I just cannot understand how america has given both Bush presidents two full rounds and now a lot of them are not willing to give their first
actually decent president in a long time his second round.
Especially if the only alternative is a republican candidate.
Generally it's weird that you guys only get to choose between two parties and two candidates each election (and half the time one of them is the last president).
You'd think that over the decades at least a few more parties would have risen up that represent more different mindsets and thus allow the elections to more accurately represent what the people
actually want.
I mean, our system over here isn't perfect either, but people would explode in rage if we suddenly had a two-party system here and one of the two parties was a conversative and fanatically religious one. (
which, inexplicably, still exists in modern times even though having only barely changed it's mindset over the past century)
No, I do have to vote for one of them if I want to feel like I have a say in anything.
You can write "BOTH OF THESE ARE BAD" on your piece of paper and hand that in.
It is a contribution to the election, and it's better than not participating at all, and definitely WAY better than just forcing yourself to vote for someone even though you actually don't like him.
If, suddenly, 50% of america's population hand in empty or "both guys suck" votes, it will have an effect.
Instead of just saying "meh" and supporting the system they don't like by voting someone they don't like (or ignoring the problem by not voting), that will actually change something. They can't get away with ignoring that if enough people do it.
And, if I remember correctly, america's declaration of independence tells you that, if you don't like your government, it is not only your right but your duty to change something about it.