- Joined
- Sep 13, 2009
- Messages
- 31,463
- Solutions
- 2
- Reaction score
- 32,187
- Trophies
- 3
- Location
- Gaming Grotto
- XP
- 30,982
- Country

It isn't hard to see his "point" though. 2,418 games of the PlayStation verus 387 on the N64 is sort of a deal breaker for many. The lifespan of the PlayStation was also considerably longer then that of the N64. It sold nearly 5 times as much as the N64 did, so you can't say it didn't have a fanbase (thaddius's number for the PSX is wrong as he is not counting the PSOne revision). I also disagree with the fact that only RPG's were exceptional on the PSX - what about all the sports games like FIFA? They flourished on the console. What about action games, like Syphon Filter? What about actiony flight sims like Ace Combat? What about Mech sims like Armored Core or Mech Warrior? The PSX was an *extremely versatile* console, and I can't say it doesn't have good FPS'es to be honest - think of Medal of Honor for instance - a timeless classic! Also, what about Silent Hill? What about Dino Crisis? What about all those great survival horrors that defined the PlayStation? What about the 3D Final Fantasies?Which is hilarious since it only had one analog stick.
In fact the PS1 is lacking in a lot of genres. It only really stood out with it's RPGs.
But frankly your tone is really putting me off, Guild. You're arguing over other people's opinions as if they are a personal insult against you and you must set them straight with the righteous truth.
In my opinion this is really a close choice between the N64 and the PS1. There is nothing objective about this.
As much as Iove the N64, to me there is no doubt who should "win" this.













