Steam now requires age verification for UK users purchasing mature games

steam.png

As part of the effects of the UK's Online Safety Act, Steam is now requiring proof and age verification for users in the UK, if they wish to purchase mature games. Before, users would simply input their date of birth, but now, it has to be proven. The steps to access mature games requires customers to be signed into a Steam account, go to their account settings, and opt-in to mature content games. Once you've opted in, you'll have to verify your age, by adding a credit card to your account. This will trigger a $0 charge to the card, and then allow access.

Why we use this process​

In the UK, Ofcom is the independent regulator for online safety. Ofcom’s guidance on the OSA states that one highly effective age assurance measure is credit card checks. This is because, in the UK, an individual must be at least 18 years of age to obtain a credit card, therefore credit card issuers are obliged to verify the age of an applicant before providing them with a credit card.

Having the credit card stored as a payment method acts as an additional deterrent against circumventing age verification by sharing a single Steam user account among multiple persons.

Privacy and security​

Among all age assurance mechanisms reviewed by Valve, this process preserves the maximum degree of user privacy.

The data processed in the verification process is identical to that of the millions of other Steam users who make purchases or store their payment details for convenience. The verification process therefore provides no information about a user's content preferences to payment providers or other third parties.

Valve handles the verification process using its own internal payment processing system, which is independently certified under the PCI-DSS standard.

To find out more about our privacy practices, please see our privacy policy

Contesting an incorrect age assurance status​

Should you be unable to register your credit card on Steam, please contact your local bank. Our data minimal approach means that we typically do not have insight into reasons why a given credit card use fails. However, should you not be able to resolve such an issue with your bank, please open a Steam Support ticket.

:arrow: Source
 
I've wanted to complain upon seeing the title, but after reading the body, this probably seems like the best way possible to stay compliant.

No ID or face scan BS, just inserting credit card info that you probably already handed to Valve to buy games on Steam.

No stupid charges either like how Nintendo charges a $0.50 fee for a parental controls reset to US users.

It's crazy that only Valve had the idea that age could also be verified through other means which don't divulge personal info.
 
Interesting. Perhaps they were lying then, or it only works with certain specific banks/brands of debit card.

It used to work, but it would come back after some time (I guess once the checks to see which type of card it was come through).

It's only literal porn games at the moment, but if they move it to anything rated 18, anyone who can't/doesn't have a credit card is fucked. 20 year old account, but please prove you are 18.

Oh well. Roll on reform (only people that will get rid of it for now).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xzi
Remember this is because we have a generation of parents who can't parent and a government easily bought out with late stage capitalists.
Late stage capitalism isn't a thing. Agree on the parents though.
 
Seriously? Who's letting kids on Steam unmonitored, anyway?!?
Parents are letting their kids online and making videos unmonitored. Parents have seriously failed at raising their kids, which is why governments are overstepping their boundaries.

I might add, the UK has a massive CSEM problem. These laws haven’t done shit to end that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChronosNotashi
The law isn't about protecting kids, it never was. Think of the children is just the wedge to get it in.

This law is about normalising handing over ID online, so it's not such a big leap when eventually the "digital id" comes along and ties all your online activities to a government profile.
It's about suppressing stuff the government doesn't want you to see, like illegal immigration. 16 years old will be able to vote at the next election, but stuff like that can be age gated. Odd that, next election is likely to be fought over immigration and oh look, age gated. The categories of "harmful" stuff are broad, easy to twist and use as a hammer to set ofcom on things the government doesn't like. There's also nice things in there like "it's an offence to cause non trivial psychological harm with a false statement". So thought policing, non trivial harm isn't defined anyway (or it wasn't when I looked), so that will certainly be applied equally and fairly, I'm sure.

Governments defence of it is literally "you are on the side of Jimmy Savile" if you are against it. That's not a joke or hyperbole, Peter Kyle, government minister, the Science, Innovation and Technology Secretary literally said that. It's been repeated by other Labour mps. Then went on TV and begged people not to use a VPN because if you do, you are harming children.

Can't actually defend the criticisms, no, just accuse everyone of being on the side of Jimmy Savile, says it all.

Same as the snoopers charter (isps have to log & store connection records for 12 months). That was also "think of the children". Nothing to do with surveillance, just pure coincidence that it never went through until mps were opted out despite mps constantly being reveled as sex pests or you know watching porn, no sorry, tractors in parliament.
 
Last edited by Armadillo,
Parents these days smh

Ha ha ha no, there have always been shit parents that left kids unattended and there have always been hysterical housewives bleating about how the responsibility to watch over their kids is everyone else's but their own, and there have always been politicians using said bleating housewives to push their agenda, under the eternal rallying cry of WON'T SOMEONE PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tipi and Xzi
as an adult that doesn’t even have a credit card this would’ve sucked

nowadays there’s a bajillion other alternate payment method that I’m 30 and I never have to touch credit card at all

No gov, I’m not gonna create a credit card just get a loicense to buy a video game, glad I don’t live in UK 🤦‍♂️

also this is gonna destroy any anonymity I have on steam
 
Last edited by whitesword7,
You sure that's a good comparison though? Or you're just parroting something along the lines of: "Uh... What's worse!? Ah yes! Good old Nazism, nothing beats that!"

*posts in GBATEMP*
What is this, Nazi Germany!? Oh wait it's UK. Easy to mix them sometimes...


The god awful Nazi Germany provided social programs to families in which the Government forgave loans on homes and reduced debts for every children German parents had. At the fourth child, all loans were totally forgiven (including homes/apartments) and every children had access to health and school programs.

So you're comparing Nazi Germany to nowadays?
 
  • Like
Reactions: CORE
"Steam now requires age verification for UK users purchasing mature games"

Just be glad that they don't require you to prove that you are actually mature, whiney incel gamerboys.
 
Remember this is because we have a generation of parents who can't parent and a government easily bought out with late stage capitalists.
Is the idea that all of these age verification companies lobbied to get this passed so that they could sell their compliance solutions? Wouldn't all of those companies being forced to implement age verification have lobbied against it? It seems like there'd be a lot more money on the side of companies that are now being regulated than on the side of the companies profiting from the regulation. Unless the idea is to push smaller players out of the market with expensive regulations, but that's a risk of regulation in general.
 
The god awful Nazi Germany provided social programs to families in which the Government forgave loans on homes and reduced debts for every children German parents had. At the fourth child, all loans were totally forgiven (including homes/apartments) and every children had access to health and school programs.
You seem to have conveniently forgotten about Anne Frank and the million or so children the right-wing fascist Nazis murdered instead of giving them access to health and school programs. It is always a mistake to try to humanize the subhumans.
 
You seem to have conveniently forgotten about Anne Frank and the million or so children the right-wing fascist Nazis murdered instead of giving them access to health and school programs. It is always a mistake to try to humanize the subhumans.
Ah yes... forgot about that tiny detail.
I got carried over by the fact that Nazi Germany treated better their citizens than any government nowadays.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CORE
As long as they were the right "kind" of citizen...
No distinction from today and the censorship.
Or you're implying that what's happening in that part of the world in 2025 is very different from what happened in that part of the world in 1940?

And thanks for reforcing my totally unrelated political statement.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum