Fuck AI art

[SDA]

I don't know you but this entire discussion has gone way too far for my tastes.

 

[MPRTwice]

Yes you can, to stop replying on it so heavenly

You would rather have convenience over real efforts

"You would rather have convenience over real efforts" - agreed on this statement, and this summarizes why people keep erroneously calling me a "god" at hand-to-hand combat, chess, debate, fitness, engineering, and everything else I bother putting any kind of effort whatsoever into.

ChatGPT was a joke of an opponent to debate against and win:

AutoCAD, now seen as "elite" if done in 2D even by Tesla and their CEO:

They are simply lazy and jealous; a bad combination. The pictures at the boxing gym are of a man with a very modernized salty expression on his face as I lit up that bag while being exhausted from heat exhaustion prior to that all day. That kind of salt is on my critics' faces right before they throw hissy fits. I'd say they act like little girls throwing a spoiled tantrum, but even the girls I train hit harder with their punches when holding back than Thailand Muay Thai instructors using full-contact kicks to the ribs. Again, it's called: effort. Like sense, it is not so common anymore.

People think these things are impossible because they never put in the effort. Instant gratification leads to instant feelings hurt when someone comes in who bothers to not be lazy.

And even those with a "Musk" or an overinflated "Bill" understand the power of being a sole proprietor of your own working custom designed v8 engine from scratch. It's called: effort, and AI loves to turn people into toddlers because it does the effort for them.

And teenagers can design these in AutoCAD easily when given proper encouragement, so then the Ph.D.’s in Engineering get very "salty" and their face turns red out of that same petty jealousy that a kid can do what they say is impossible for them: "It's not fair! I was called a prodigy among prodigies, and this was my magnum opus, and I was _so_ close to doing this after sixty years and your kids did this in only forty hours!":

View attachment Bedroom1.png


Be lazy, rely on AI like a crutch, and throw hissy fits, or you can do what I did and think nothing of overcoming the AI that defeated stockfish (the latter AI of which defeated Magnus Calrsen back in 2020) in five minutes while being able to easily pick apart ADCC champions like the "prince of leglocks" that defeated Gordon Ryan in 2014 and has been training since; I prefer my choice.

Addendum: I knew the devil was not going to take that shot at him and eat it without retaliation; a honeybee hive is now inside of our apartment complex, and honeybees are swarming the entrance to my place in a frenzy. Some men are coming over tomorrow to gut it out, and hopefully let them out in the country instead of killing the queen: I like having honey and royal jelly in my diet. As long as I continue to not fear them as I approach my car, they will leave me alone; insects can detect fear and fearlessness.

 

[Skv0ra]

ai is going to be used to deny work to millions, and severely devalue the work of countless others

Literally said it already, but juan more time - if someone's creative field work is only on the level of TitKok room temp IQ gen Z'ers, and they don't even realize the fact or aren't willing to bolster their skills and quality of output - they weren't worth hiring in the first place in a modern business scape. Majority of the world isn't Japan where companies would hire JUST to have a few paperweights on payroll to look good in front of others having such a big staff roster. Quality of work matters!

 

[OilFreak]

Literally said it already, but juan more time - if someone's creative field work is only on the level of TitKok room temp IQ gen Z'ers, and they don't even realize the fact or aren't willing to bolster their skills and quality of output - they weren't worth hiring in the first place in a modern business scape. Majority of the world isn't Japan where companies would hire JUST to have a few paperweights on payroll to look good in front of others having such a big staff roster. Quality of work matters!

It doesn't matter to some

 

[Jayro]

Literally said it already, but juan more time - if someone's creative field work is only on the level of TitKok room temp IQ gen Z'ers, and they don't even realize the fact or aren't willing to bolster their skills and quality of output - they weren't worth hiring in the first place in a modern business scape. Majority of the world isn't Japan where companies would hire JUST to have a few paperweights on payroll to look good in front of others having such a big staff roster. Quality of work matters!

This. You get out what you put in, and I.Q. and workmanship skills have gone down hill SHARPLY at an alarming rate since 2007/2008, when the economy was first tanking and simultaneously smartphones were becoming a prevalent thing. Smartphones (and worthless "goof-off" apps like TikTok) have made people so fucking lazy and stupid, but nobody is wanting to have THAT conversation...

 

[Skv0ra]

This. You get out what you put in, and I.Q. and workmanship skills have gone down hill SHARPLY at an alarming rate since 2007/2008, when the economy was first tanking and simultaneously smartphones were becoming a prevalent thing. Smartphones (and worthless "goof-off" apps like TikTok) have made people so fucking lazy and stupid, but nobody is wanting to have THAT conversation...

Answer is....Apple and iCrap 1. To profiteer, they broke the golden rule of HIGH technology: it does NOT belong in below room temp IQ hands for they will use it solely for pr0n and to spread their idiocy like bush fires.

And not even a decade later everyone got to witness the downfall fruits of that rotten tree.

Hell, personal anecdote - how do you fuck up FOOD photographs so badly, as supposed "pro", that corporate has to send ME out to make it right? I worked with such nimrods in the past and just marveled at fact of the matter.

Post automatically merged: Apr 1, 2025

It doesn't matter to some

That's the other downside - lots of businesses didn't care about quality of their marketing even before AI, but at the same time they thus limit their customer base to dolts who can't be bothered to care if they're seeing a business' actual product or a stick horse drawing.

 

[MPRTwice]

This. You get out what you put in, and I.Q. and workmanship skills have gone down hill SHARPLY at an alarming rate since 2007/2008, when the economy was first tanking and simultaneously smartphones were becoming a prevalent thing. Smartphones (and worthless "goof-off" apps like TikTok) have made people so fucking lazy and stupid, but nobody is wanting to have THAT conversation...

Illustrating the positives of your statement, in Texas they had an explosion in demands for English teachers as soon at the "smart" phones became common, just as how math scores in the U.S. went beneath those of other places such as Japan as soon as the calculator became widespread.

I'm my own dishwasher in my house and my handwraps are my wrists being conditioned to heavy hitting bare-knuckle punches unless a gym I visit demands I put them on (to keep them from worrying for no reason). There are those who want your money and say you need to obey and pay them to be happy on both political sides: you don't.

Happiness and Inner Peace are free, just like your life.

 

[osm70]

You need to get back to reality

Easier said than done when everyone's too intrigued by the way AI is doing

Sketching

But here's the thing, everyone else has that same mindset and my biggest concern is that eventually it's gonna become the norm, an over-reliance affecting a large group of individuals

Not too mention that AI art literally steals existing drawings from other artists

You say that as if real artists didn't do that.

 

[Cranesbill]

You say that as if real artists didn't do that.

The bad ones

And again, there’s a difference between references and just copying an existing art

 

[osm70]

The bad ones

And again, there’s a difference between references and just copying an existing art

If you copy existing art, won't people know on first glance?

 

[Cranesbill]

If you copy existing art, won't people know on first glance?

Literally the same with Ai art, You’re just going back in circles

 

[gameboy64]

When I first saw Ghibli styled images they were mostly memes, and they were funny to me to some extent. However, I've seen people abuse it and even saying: “Oh AI made it in seconds while it took months and/or years for Ghibli to create the similar thing”. AI didn't make it in the matter of seconds, it has stolen that art and that was the freaking point of the whole drama about it.

 

[Jayro]

When I first saw Ghibli styled images they were mostly memes, and they were funny to me to some extent. However, I've seen people abuse it and even saying: “Oh AI made it in seconds while it took months and/or years for Ghibli to create the similar thing”. AI didn't make it in the matter of seconds, it has stolen that art and that was the freaking point of the whole drama about it.

The Ai didn't steal the art. It learned the style of the studio in question. You guys are throwing around half-truths and not using the right words. That right there is half the problem with people thinking Ai "steals" when it's really just referencing like humans do.

 

[OilFreak]

But it's not human. It doesn't get the same rights that humans do.

 

[Cranesbill]

The Ai didn't steal the art. It learned the style of the studio in question. You guys are throwing around half-truths and not using the right words. That right there is half the problem with people thinking Ai "steals" when it's really just referencing like humans do.

Funny how we went over this and you chose to ignore it, telling me to go die mad about it

"Someone explained this

"Imagine you built a sandcastle you're really proud of from years of experience, only for it to be destroyed by someone who then took your work and made it look worse and unrecognizable and claim it as their own"

It's not a reference if it shows too much similarities to the original drawings like the poses and style

A reference are pictures of an original artwork that artists use to base off their own artistic creations like if they want to draw some cartoon character, they can use the official reference sheets to get the character right and then have them do whatever like riding a bike or driving a car

Ai Art just uses real art and tweaks it to whatever the person commanding it wants, not having everything made from the ground up

So if someone types a cartoon character wanting to a ride a bike, AI will just use an existing drawing of a cartoon character riding a bike that someone drew and mess that up when generating it"

 

[Jayro]

Funny how we went over this and you chose to ignore it, telling me to go die mad about it

"Someone explained this

"Imagine you built a sandcastle you're really proud of from years of experience, only for it to be destroyed by someone who then took your work and made it look worse and unrecognizable and claim it as their own"

It's not a reference if it shows too much similarities to the original drawings like the poses and style

A reference are pictures of an original artwork that artists use to base off their own artistic creations like if they want to draw some cartoon character, they can use the official reference sheets to get the character right and then have them do whatever like riding a bike or driving a car

Ai Art just uses real art and tweaks it to whatever the person commanding it wants, not having everything made from the ground up

So if someone types a cartoon character wanting to a ride a bike, AI will just use an existing drawing of a cartoon character riding a bike that someone drew and mess that up when generating it"

Nobody is gonna watch 3 YouTube videos, get real. And gatekeeping how many details you reuse? That's just hilarious. Strawman argument at best.

Post automatically merged: Apr 1, 2025

I bet 99.999999999% of GBAtemp users didn't draw their own profile pictures either.

*Cue the fake outrage*

 

[Cranesbill]

Nobody is gonna watch 3 YouTube videos, get real. And gatekeeping how many details you reuse? That's just hilarious. Strawman argument at best.

3, 30 seconds to 1 minute youtube videos. Bruh you literally got nothing better to do right now, now you're just stalling

And yeah, I had to because you're the one who ignores them. You really think you're in the right for gaslighting me despite all their information I've provided has been ignored by you??

Jeez no wonder why STD and Handy are saying this escalated badly, you really are a pain in the ass to deal with

 

[Jayro]

3, 30 seconds to 1 minute youtube videos. Bruh you literally got nothing better to do right now, now you're just stalling

And yeah, I had to because you're the one who ignores them. You really think you're in the right for gaslighting me despite all their information I've provided has been ignored by you??

Jeez no wonder why STD and Handy are saying this escalated badly, you really are a pain in the ass to deal with

Ai is a TOOL at the end of the day. Absolutely nobody is forcing you to use it.

 

[SylverReZ]

Everyone is a product at the end of the day. Corporations will do anything to shove AI down everybody's throats. You cannot opt out of this garbage without not signing up to their services.

 

[CoolMe]

Yeah I'm just saying this because I've been a Pixel artist for 5 years and I'm really pissed that some are keep using it for cheap art (especially right now with the new Ghibli ai)

based.
you're just jelly that it's way better than you, and it learned all dat and more in much, much less than 5 years..