Would you circumcise your son? Why or why not

[Kwyjor]

Most women don't like cottage cheese on their bologna

Aaand there it is.

I don't think you are ever going to find an uncircumcised man complaining about "cheese". This seems to be an imaginary concern of circumcised people.

 

[mrdude]

I have viewed enough adult content in my life to be able to determine a major difference in the aesthetic value of a penor (not that I am a fan of the man gland), and I simply wouldn't want to subject any woman to smegma and a very unappealing flap of unnecessary skin.

Most girls I've ever been with were not too stoked on their exes who weren't already cut, and I think they would know what they're talking about.

FFS what unclean people have you been watching? Most people wash regularly and don't have "smegma", obviously there's some grotty mingers out there - usually they have straggly hair and look unkempt and smell of BO and are unhinged leftys. Being the owner of a penis with a foreskin I can't recall any time ever when I've gone to have sex with a woman and noticed I had "smegma" or had any woman complain about it either. You've been watching too many movies, or you just hang about with smelly people.

It's a well know fact smelly people are usualy left wing - remember L is for Labour, L is for Lice.

 

[InsaneNutter]

No, if I ever had a son he could decide for himself later in life. Why force it on anyone?

 

[CraddaPoosta]

FFS what unclean people have you been watching? Most people wash regularly and don't have "smegma", obviously there's some grotty mingers out there - usually they have straggly hair and look unkempt and smell of BO and are unhinged leftys. Being the owner of a penis with a foreskin I can't recall any time ever when I've gone to have sex with a woman and noticed I had "smegma" or had any woman complain about it either. You've been watching too many movies, or you just hang about with smelly people.

It's a well know fact smelly people are usualy left wing - remember L is for Labour, L is for Lice.

As a dude who is not into dudes and has never in my life encountered an uncut peen, or a cut peen besides my own, I cannot speak on the hygiene and cleanliness of a bloke who has a fleshy turtle shell covering his gland.

I am going off of personal experience related to me by various ladies in my life who have encountered less-than-aesthetic pork javelins. From what they have told me, it's a bit off-putting to have to handle that extra skin and peel back to get to the center of the Tootsie Roll pop.

I have never regretted my streamlined junk, nor been forlorn over not having to pull back extra skin to wash my frenulum. If I have boys, they will be cut. And I doubt any of them will be mad at me for it.

 

[mrdude]

I am going off of personal experience related to me by various ladies in my life who have encountered less-than-aesthetic pork javelins. From what they have told me, it's a bit off-putting to have to handle that extra skin and peel back to get to the center of the Tootsie Roll pop.

I generally don't talk to women about other mens dicks or foreskins, but obviously the women you've been talking to have been shagging some grotty twats which makes me think they must be pretty grotty themselves as clean women tend to go with clean men. Just walk around anywhere public and you can spot a grot from 100 meters, I tend to stay at least 5 meters away from those types as I don't want them infecting my air space.

 

[CraddaPoosta]

I generally don't talk to women about other mens dicks or foreskins, but obviously the women you've been talking to have been shagging some grotty twats which makes me think they must be pretty grotty themselves as clean women tend to go with clean men. Just walk around anywhere public and you can spot a grot from 100 meters, I tend to stay at least 5 meters away from those types as I don't want them infecting my air space.

Well, if they were willing to throw dat ass on ME, their standards were obviously low to begin with.

Obviously I am speaking hyperbolically. I have not shacked up with a bunch of vinegary coozes. But, this topic has been one that I have brought up to women before, out of morbid curiosity, and I have yet to find a single woman who PREFERS an uncut schlong. Most are OKAY with it, but I have never encountered a female who is all like, "Man, nothing gets my panties moist like some foreskin."

In my experience, women are sensual creatures, more than visual. Visual stimulation is what gets men randy. Most women do not consider the male member to be a body part that has visual appeal. This is why most chicks do NOT want dick pics. It just doesn't work the same for a lot of them.

I don't have any skin in this game, to pardon the intentional and egregious pun. But, it's 2022, where all chicks are balder downstairs than an eagle, women get labioplasties and hymen reconstructive surgeries, dudes can become women, and half the tits you see above 34C on a woman who isn't obese are fake.

I accept the world we live in. I am an aestheticist. It's cool if other people have other preferences. I am just glad I have never had to worry about extra flesh when I am totally not wanking in the shower.

 

[smf]

For the most part it is a very safe procedure, and has been practiced hundreds of millions of times without any significant side effects and with exceedingly rare complications even in the most resource poor regions

"without any significant side effects"?

I suppose if you ignore all the problems that occur directly as a result of having the procedure, then yes there are no side effects.

 

[mrdude]

I had my comment deleted because I was talking about genital mutilation, which is the EXACT topic we are discussing.

I do not understand.

Silence, the mods have spoken! Remember If it's a subject they dislike to be discussed, it will be purged from the internet..... there's no free speech in this forum, you can kiss your your first amendment rights goodbye, you don't live in a democracy anymore.

 

[DinohScene]

Silence, the mods have spoken! Remember If it's a subject they dislike to be discussed, it will be purged from the internet..... there's no free speech in this forum, you can kiss your your first amendment rights goodbye, you don't live in a democracy anymore.

If you want freedom of speech, you shouldn't sign up for a moderated forum.

 

[x65943]

The subject here is circumcision if you want to talk about unrelated topics you can make your own thread for that

 

[CraddaPoosta]

Silence, the mods have spoken! Remember If it's a subject they dislike to be discussed, it will be purged from the internet..... there's no free speech in this forum, you can kiss your your first amendment rights goodbye, you don't live in a democracy anymore.

Dinoh is one of the decent ones, man. Bad form.

 

[cearp]

Had two sons and did to both. Most women don't like cottage cheese on their bologna and it looks like an elephant trunk uncut. Every woman I've been around has said "GROSS!!!" about uncircumcised dongs. My sons are thankful.

most women also don't like it if your hair is greasy, if you don't wipe properly, and don't brush your teeth.
= wash yourself!

but if parents don't think they can teach their sons to have proper personal hygiene, then that's the fault of the parents.

repeat that over a few generations, and sure, you'll have women who think a normal penis is weird because they rarely see one - and that's ridiculous.

 

[The Catboy]

Had two sons and did to both. Most women don't like cottage cheese on their bologna and it looks like an elephant trunk uncut. Every woman I've been around has said "GROSS!!!" about uncircumcised dongs. My sons are thankful.

As someone who has a lot of experience around wood, I can say that this is a hygiene issue. Teaching kids how to properly clean themselves is far better than preparing for them not wash regularly. There’s very few excuses for not regularly bathing.

 

[Kwyjor]

Remember If it's a subject they dislike to be discussed, it will be purged from the internet.....

Well, as per my earlier post: if you actually wanted to have an informed discussion with things like expert opinions based on factual evidence, why would you ask about a topic like this here!?

 

[eyeliner]

I won't. I'm not in a third world country. That's sanctioned genital mutilation.

I won't even pierce my daughter's ears. Let her decide what she wants when she gets older.

I don't even impose religion.

There is no point besides ReLigiOus Beliefs or family pressure. Circumcision needs to be eradicated everywhere. Wash your peepee regularly and you will be fine.

Also, an uncut penis is EXTREMELY unconfortable while having sex if there's no lubrication (natural or otherwise), both for male or female.

Leave tricky dicky alone!

 

[CraddaPoosta]

I just find it inconsistent how certain folks are completely okay with genital mutilation (which is permanent and irreversible) if it involves "gender identity" or "gender-affirming surgery", but they clutch their pearls when confronted with the idea of having a baby boy's foreskin clipped.

Completely removing a child's penis or breasts when they are still CHILDREN is completely fine, but removing a foreskin (with absolutely no relevance to sexual preference or gender identity) is "HELL TO THE NAW!"

One of these things is not like the other. One of these things just doesn't make sense.

 

[HellGhast]

Big NO (theoretically coz I don't plan on ever having kids)

I was circumcised without my consent and if I had a choice I would never have undergone the procedure.

Post automatically merged: Dec 16, 2022

I disagree slightly, look, circumcision is not mutilation, first that's that.
Second, culture, tradition, the heritage from your ethnicity are all things that relates too deep with your identity. The baby make no choice, true, but the baby made no choice when you gave a language, a religion and a culture either. Those things likely will be permanent just like a circumcision.
So for culture reasons I believe it's fine. For those outside those groups, then it's more a medical matter I believe. For adults it's kinda obvious that it's a self choice.

I completely disagree
-Circumcision is mutilation disguised as cultural heritage.
-I was circumcised without my consent for cultural reasons and I completely reject that culture.
-My parents are christian but I rejected religion and I'm atheist.
-You forgot about naming the baby, and to that end I've been trying to change my surname from my sadistic father's middle** name to my mother's middle** name, and then I realized I also have to change my first and middle names too coz am named after my father's malicious brother, so am getting 3 new names as soon as am ready to foot lawyer fees, court fees and government fees so financial constraints are the roadblock.

**The father's middle name is the surname or if it's a single mother then mother's middle name becomes surname, so if I marry then my wifes' and kids' surname will be my middle name, as such my father's surname is my paternal grandfather's middle and mother's maiden surname my maternal grandfather's middle name.
My mother and my siblings use father's middle as surname.**

-I do not know my native mother tongue and have no desire to learn that language.

I made a choice, I refused to be shackled to outdated practices under the guise of culture and as such all people have the freedom to live their own lives once free from parental tyranny, but in my case there is one area where am permanently shackled to genital mutilation without my choice or consent.

Being born into an ethnicity does not make you a slave to that culture.

 

[cearp]

Completely removing a child's penis or breasts when they are still CHILDREN is completely fine, but removing a foreskin (with absolutely no relevance to sexual preference or gender identity) is "HELL TO THE NAW!"

One of these things is not like the other. One of these things just doesn't make sense.

I'm not sure that anyone here was comparing these two things.
Many people disagree with both practices.
I'd assume most people who agree with one of these ideas wouldn't agree with both.

 

[mrdude]

I'm not sure that anyone here was comparing these two things.
Many people disagree with both practices.
I'd assume most people who agree with one of these ideas wouldn't agree with both.

I'm pretty sure that comparing these two things was meant to show the pure hypocracy of a certain group of people.

However let's face facts here, you have a group of unscrupulous people making lots of money from medical procedures and a lifetime on selling drugs to their patients, so as long as the cash is rolling in for them and they are making plenty of profits I wouldn't expect them to change anytime soon or to care about little Timmy's private parts as they don't care much for the patient at all - cash is king in their eyes. Also don't think the politians care either, they just want those people that have these procedures to vote for them, they have no interest in the person - only the vote.

 

[Desconocido90]

I'm against it. It's an unnecessary, irreversible surgery that cause pain and it's almost always done without the consent of the child.

The health advantages (hygiene, a small protection against STD) are too small for being relevant in any country where condoms and showers are affordable.

I dare to say here it might be counter-productive, creating a false sensation of protection that leads some to have unprotected sex.

And health is an excuse for religious and cultural circumcisions, to justify a not-consented, painful modification in a baby. Since it's irreversible and has some effects in sexual life, if there isn't a reasonable medical reason for it, it should be delayed until the kid is old enough to make an informed decision.

I want you to remind you there have being cases of deaths due to circumcision (the ones done outside medical facilities, generally the ones that are religious motivated or in the third world).

Some here compare circumcision with female genital mutilation. Although both are bad, the later is so much worse that I think it's unfair compare them as they're were the same.

Completely removing a child's penis or breasts when they are still CHILDREN is completely fine, but removing a foreskin (with absolutely no relevance to sexual preference or gender identity) is "HELL TO THE NAW!"

One of these things is not like the other. One of these things just doesn't make sense.

Don't lie: In most countries, if not all, children can't go through a sexual assignment surgery. As far as I know, like in my Country Spain, you only have the option when you're over 18, and there's usually more limitations (like getting diagnosed with gender disforia diagnosis first, or going through years of hormones first)

Another way your message is wrong: you can't have the breast removed to a child, because they wouldn't have any. Mamoplastias for trans aren't done until completing puberty, adulthood... when the breasts have stopped growing.

I'm not against a 18 years old choosing to circumcise himself (a closer example to the trans surgery you critize) or going through assignment surgery.
But I'm against a baby, or a very little infant, being circumcised. Too young to understand and give consent.