Homebrew SigHax Updates and Discussion Thread

Kingy

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2016
Messages
959
Trophies
1
Location
England I guess
XP
3,779
Country
United Kingdom
lmao I'm done.

The sigpatch doesn't exploit the bootrom itself, the actual bootrom exploit exploits it, lmao.
All the sigpatch does is use the exploited bootrom to it's advantage, to enable FW signing.

Have a nice day!
 
  • Like
Reactions: jtvjan and cheuble

adrifcastr

Well-Known Member
OP
Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2016
Messages
2,038
Trophies
0
XP
1,947
Country
Germany
I just posted that and you said I was rude.
totally confused with everything now, half the users here say my op is correct he other ones say I completely messed it up

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

Just ignore the people who don't release exploiting a bug in the bootrom is a bootrom exploit
k thanks
 

KevinX8

Proud user of The Dark Theme
Member
Joined
May 12, 2016
Messages
960
Trophies
0
Age
33
Location
Down there
XP
1,013
Country
lmao I'm done.

The sigpatch doesn't exploit the bootrom itself, the actual bootrom exploit exploits it, lmao.
All the sigpatch does is use the exploited bootrom to it's advantage, to enable FW signing.

Have a nice day!
We aren't touching the bootrom, it's readonly anway, all we are doing is exploiting the fact it only requires half assed signatures to load the firmware which can be brute forced since its only a couple bytes that are required
 

zoogie

playing around in the end of life
Developer
Joined
Nov 30, 2014
Messages
8,560
Trophies
2
XP
15,000
Country
Micronesia, Federated States of
lmao I'm done.

The sigpatch doesn't exploit the bootrom itself, the actual bootrom exploit exploits it, lmao.
All the sigpatch does is use the exploited bootrom to it's advantage, to enable FW signing.

Have a nice day!
I think the misunderstanding here is the fact that an exploit, in your definition, can only mean taking over control of the code. That is not the case, defeating the bootrom's ability to verify firmware code as correctly signed is definitely exploiting a flaw in the bootrom itself.
 
Last edited by zoogie,

adrifcastr

Well-Known Member
OP
Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2016
Messages
2,038
Trophies
0
XP
1,947
Country
Germany
I think the misunderstanding here is the fact that an exploit, in your definition, can only mean taking over control of the code. That is not the case, defeating the bootrom's ability to verify firmware code as correctly signed is definitely exploit a flaw in the bootrom itself.
We aren't touching the bootrom, it's readonly anway, all we are doing is exploiting the fact it only requires half assed signatures to load the firmware which can be brute forced since its only a couple bytes that are required

Fine btw @KevinX8 added your post to my signature actually that was really funny
 

jt_1258

Ella
Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2016
Messages
3,053
Trophies
2
Age
24
XP
4,880
Country
United States
it basically turns this
300px-Nintendo-3DS-AquaOpen.png

into this
F8332699-01.jpg
pretty much
 

The Catboy

GBAtemp Official Catboy™: Boywife
Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
27,950
Trophies
4
Location
Making a non-binary fuss
XP
39,368
Country
Antarctica
What's up with the scene lately? Everyone has become such naysayers. Like this is cool stuff! Another means of booting into CFW? And even faster than A9LH! That's cool as hell!
I don't remember this much pissing and moaning when A9LH was revealed.
 

Flying Scotsman

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2016
Messages
350
Trophies
0
XP
1,333
Country
United States
What's up with the scene lately? Everyone has become such naysayers. Like this is cool stuff! Another means of booting into CFW? And even faster than A9LH! That's cool as hell!
I don't remember this much pissing and moaning when A9LH was revealed.

Some have been spoilt for choice with CFW and means of putting it on their 3DS'.

They'd no doubt be a little more humble if things like this were held back until it's needed instead of just throwing it into the basket of current CFW installation methods etc.
 

The Catboy

GBAtemp Official Catboy™: Boywife
Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
27,950
Trophies
4
Location
Making a non-binary fuss
XP
39,368
Country
Antarctica
Some have been spoilt for choice with CFW and means of putting it on their 3DS'.

They'd no doubt be a little more humble if things like this were held back until it's needed instead of just throwing it into the basket of current CFW installation methods etc.
Or we could just be happy that we are getting somewhere. This is actually big stuff! We will have even more control over the system than ever before!
People are acting like this is some small project they could have done in a few hours, instead of the major achievement that took years to accomplish.
 
Last edited by The Catboy,

GerbilSoft

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
2,395
Trophies
2
Age
34
XP
4,252
Country
United States
lmao I'm done.

The sigpatch doesn't exploit the bootrom itself, the actual bootrom exploit exploits it, lmao.
All the sigpatch does is use the exploited bootrom to it's advantage, to enable FW signing.

Have a nice day!
This is quite possibly the dumbest thing I've read all day.

The boot ROM has a vulnerability in its RSA signature verification; therefore, something that takes advantage of it is a boot ROM exploit. What else would it be, an Internet Explorer exploit?

...unless you're trying to say that the only possible "boot ROM exploit" is a way to dump the boot ROM.

EDIT: Oh, so you're trying to be pedantic by claiming the signature patch itself isn't an "exploit", but the program used to generate the patch is. Or something like that; I don't speak fluent noob.
 
Last edited by GerbilSoft,

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
    K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2: Right onto uremums 3d printed dildo