Hacking You Freaks.

  • Thread starter Thread starter FaTaL_ErRoR
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 8,960
  • Replies Replies 36
  • Likes Likes 1
and.........nothing happened....... just like every time fatalerror makes one of these threads.
Lol, it was never really about that at all. I speak and things happen. Freak attack...hmm what happened right after this was posted? Oh yeah I know 5.4
The webkit the devs were stuck on really sucked for exploitation. There are later versions with much better documentation. Don't worry I have something to get us out of 5.4 as well. Just gotta hope they update to the version we think they will afterwards.
 
To be fair, that flaw really is serious to the user, so it getting patched quickly is a given.
 
Lol, it was never really about that at all. I speak and things happen. Freak attack...hmm what happened right after this was posted? Oh yeah I know 5.4
The webkit the devs were stuck on really sucked for exploitation. There are later versions with much better documentation. Don't worry I have something to get us out of 5.4 as well. Just gotta hope they update to the version we think they will afterwards.

I asked you to show evidence that FREAK led to code execution. You linked me to a page with several vulnerabilities posted on it, including FREAK, which had nothing about code execution in relation to FREAK. Then you tried claiming that the whole page was about FREAK, which is obviously false. Afterwards, you gave up trying to convince me and started talking about other bugs. It's pretty clear that your claim about FREAK leading to code execution has not been supported by any evidence.
 
I asked you to show evidence that FREAK led to code execution. You linked me to a page with several vulnerabilities posted on it, including FREAK, which had nothing about code execution in relation to FREAK. Then you tried claiming that the whole page was about FREAK, which is obviously false. Afterwards, you gave up trying to convince me and started talking about other bugs. It's pretty clear that your claim about FREAK leading to code execution has not been supported by any evidence.
Lol, it was never really about that at all. I speak and things happen. Freak attack...hmm what happened right after this was posted? Oh yeah I know 5.4
The webkit the devs were stuck on really sucked for exploitation. There are later versions with much better documentation. Don't worry I have something to get us out of 5.4 as well. Just gotta hope they update to the version we think they will afterwards.
The claim was merely to gain attention. And if I were you I wouldn't mess with 5.4 as it will be updated as well real soon. (I will post about it's major security issue and it will be patched as well)
 
The claim was merely to gain attention. And if I were you I wouldn't mess with 5.4 as it will be updated as well real soon. (I will post about it's major security issue and it will be patched as well)

It's target 5.4.0 or do nothing, and we're always trying to get the most recent bugs we can, as long as they work. If you want to post publicly about WebKit bugs and risk them getting patched, go ahead; I'm sure everyone will appreciate it. Not that I believe Nintendo is monitoring your posts that closely anyway.
 
We have seen you post like this time and again for the the past year. every time with fantastical new claims. never a single shred of evidence to back up any of them.
then when nothing comes of it you have some mysterious excuse as per usual. i guess some people just like the attention.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VinsCool
Reading up about the bug, it seems that all it lets you do is potentially perform a MITM on a Wii U app. I'd be very surprised if that would lead to code execution (but hey, prove me wrong).

Freak works very similar to heartbleed. Hell if you are vulnerable to freak chances are you are vulnerable to heartbleed as well.
https://cve.mitre.org/news/
And both of which can gain access to corrupt memory. So both in can be very good for exploitation.

And Marionumber1: Challenge accepted.

This sure sounds like you are accepting a challenge to prove mn1 wrong and show that this can lead to code execution.

The claim was merely to gain attention...

Are you admitting that you failed at this challenge?
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum