Hacking Yellows8 latest exploits allow cfw?

[Ra1d]

There are private ARM9 exploits buddy

Mind proving that buddy ? Yellow8's edited article doesn't count, because it's not a proof.

 

[lemanuel]

Mind proving that buddy ? Yellow8's edited article doesn't count, because it's not a proof.

If there was a way to prove it, they wouldn't be private

 

[Sonansune]

NO!

ok....I posted simultaneously...

 

[Ra1d]

If there was a way to prove it, they wouldn't be private

Then those are just empty words, private - not accessible, doesn't mean it can't be proven.

If it says "private property" on the fence, does it mean you can't prove that the place exists ? You can, but you can't enter.

Same thing here, posting a picture of something that can be done via ARM9 exploit only, will not reveal the method that was used to achieve ARM9 exploit.

 

[DarkFlare69]

There are private ARM9 exploits buddy

where

 

[lemanuel]

Then those are just empty words, private - not accessible, doesn't mean it can't be proven.

If it says "private property" on the fence, does it mean you can't prove that the place exists ? You can, but you can't enter.

Same thing here, posting a picture of something that can be done via ARM9 exploit only, will not reveal the method that was used to achieve ARM9 exploit.

I know. Just messing with you

 

[Sonansune]

where

yellow8....

 

[DarkFlare69]

yellow8....

ok

 

[FR0ZN]

Mind proving that buddy ? Yellow8's edited article doesn't count, because it's not a proof.

You might want to consider hanging out in the irc channels a lot more, the usual suspects who initially broke the system wide open have at least one exploit for further investigations on newer FW versions.
Just like with every system, devs always have one spare high priviledge exploit in private for these kinda situations.

And there is nothing to proof for anybody if nothing is going to get released.

 

[CreAtor135]

GW doesnt have .cia support
Why would you pay someone to set up GW, and why would you then pay for a GW. Just set up Emunand through Cake/Rei/rxTools for free (minus the cost of cubic ninja or OOT)

If you want you could get Sky3DS and boot Cubic Ninja through that, but Gateway really isnt worth getting at this stage, CFW does everything better, and for free.

Whaa... Gateway has-
-Drag n' Drop 3DS
-More noob friendly installation
-More stable
-Anything a CFW can do (besides GBA/DSi)
-And if you're more familiar with hacking, you can dualboot a CFW

I still think Gateway is better, although CFWs have certainly come a very long way.
dat upcoming cheat system thooo. maybe it'll trump ntr

 

[FR0ZN]

Another point that backs up the GW imo is the fact that there are people behind it who are capable of finding exploits.
Some people say that they just use kernel exploits which are public and tell everyone it was their effort.
But iirc the kernel exploit back in the 4.5.0 days (for example) was known to EXIST, but no code or anything else to execute was public ... only the information where the exploit is, or might be.
Didn't we see other people then use the 4.5.0 MSET entrypoint to try their homebrew code ? I remember something like mandelbrot in the early days.

And let's not forget about the OoT entrypoint ... only after Gateway released it, we saw the 3Dbrew wiki getting updated, mentioning this exploit to be already known by yellows8 and the likes.

And now before everyone starts yelling that the 9.2.0 ARM9 exploit was already public when they finally released their Ultra update. You might want to go back and remember their teaser video where they first showed GW mode running on a N3DS!

Yes, they used Cubixninja, Browserhax and 9.x MSET entrypoints from the open scene ... but hell why not?
They have proven to be capable of finding their own ways in and that's why I'm pretty sure we will see newer emuNAND support on N3DS' from them first.

 

[dark_samus3]

I'm pretty sure we will see newer emuNAND support on N3DS' from them first.

Not to mention that most CFW makers have the attitude of "just wait for GW" right now

 

[kingsora831]

Dont mean to hijack this thread but this seems a good place to ask.

I also have a N3ds with 9.0 SYSNAND and 9.5 EMUNAND with 4.5 MSET installed & GW.

Which is the best CFW available for me to be able to run GBA cias, that i can install with my current setup.
Theres so many options im not sure which is the best for me. (RXtools,Cake,Rei)

I simply wanna run GBA games from systemnand or possibly have a dualboot emunand (one for GW and one to Run the CFW) if that's possible.

Thanks.

 

[tony_2018]

Then those are just empty words, private - not accessible, doesn't mean it can't be proven.

If it says "private property" on the fence, does it mean you can't prove that the place exists ? You can, but you can't enter.

Same thing here, posting a picture of something that can be done via ARM9 exploit only, will not reveal the method that was used to achieve ARM9 exploit.

How do you show your code but keep it private without someone trying to reverse? SIMPLE!!! DON'T LET ANYONE KNOW IT EXIST

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

Not to mention that most CFW makers have the attitude of "just wait for GW" right now

Because that is the only way for them to reverse engineer it.

 

[Deleted User]

Just downgrade to 4.5 with gateway menu, it's your only cfw option. Then get rxtools.

 

[duwen]

Mind proving that buddy ? Yellow8's edited article doesn't count, because it's not a proof.

I completely agree with this, despite the lame justifications that followed it.

If the original statement had been "There may possibly be private ARM9 exploits buddy" then that would be true in anybodies book. To say that 'there are' corroborates their existence and creates a contradiction - stating they DO exist infers they're not private.

 

[tony_2018]

I completely agree with this, despite the lame justifications that followed it.

If the original statement had been "There may possibly be private ARM9 exploits buddy" then that would be true in anybodies book. To say that 'there are' corroborates their existence and creates a contradiction - stating they DO exist infers they're not private.

OH....but threads were created to speculate, in other words "try to decrypt someones statement". Than another group would use that and start another thread and go "I heard ***** ". The circle doesn't stop.....

 

[FR0ZN]

I completely agree with this, despite the lame justifications that followed it.

If the original statement had been "There may possibly be private ARM9 exploits buddy" then that would be true in anybodies book. To say that 'there are' corroborates their existence and creates a contradiction - stating they DO exist infers they're not private.

You might want to rethink your understanding of "existing" and "private" a lil bit.
Look at the Wii U development, we know userspace and kernel exploits exist for 5.5.0 ... also a IOSU exploit for 3.x FWs ... yet they are private (as in not released)

The fact that the devs who usualy find these exploits don't go on here and claim that they do have them, doesn't mean they don't exist.
And as I said, you all might want to hang out on IRC a bit more and I bet you won't believe what info gets thrown around there by the devs

 

[tjhooker73]

GW could implement themehax as an entry point farily easy. Just use a rop loader to load a new entry from homebrew launcher (Which would make compatibility a lot better for other homebrew loader exploits.)
or change the original rops to load their code (The ROP is open source so anything could happen)

 

[tony_2018]

GW could implement themehax as an entry point farily easy. Just use a rop loader to load a new entry from homebrew launcher (Which would make compatibility a lot better for other homebrew loader exploits.)
or change the original rops to load their code (The ROP is open source so anything could happen)

You have a PoC video somewhere? Or is that private...