don't take me wrong but no viruses mean what?Macs r better...no viruses...
They really should make this thread a sticky on this forum.
actually...now there are 30% more Mac users now than 2 years ago...making it 40%(Macs) and 60%(Windows) so practically it isn't much difference so...I think you just got proved wrong...and I still think Macs are better...I mean...I have a Macs and Windows...and I chose the Mac over Windows cos I like it moreAnyways, please don't make this a mac vs. windows fight. (mac +1 here)
I too have a mac, and find it frustrating having to boot into windows each time i want to put a game on my g6, convert a dpg, etc. I do it with parallels, you should buy it. It's worth the money. Good luck, and nice seeing more mac users.
10 +30LOL just because it was 10% mac and 90% windows, and there are "30%" more mac users"... doesn't make it 40% and 60%... it makes it 13% and 87%... i'm not criticising your figures... just your mathematics
The total that the full 100% is pulling from got changed though. The 30% of users that Mac gained wasn't 30% of users who switched from Windows to Mac. If that was the case, what you're saying would be mathematically correct. But it's not the case. Out of that 30 could have been plenty who originally got Macs to begin with, which adds to the total being divided. Hence, you can't just add on 30 and take away 30. Look at it like this: Windows didn't lose 30% of it's users, so how did they drop to 60%?LOL just because it was 10% mac and 90% windows, and there are "30%" more mac users"... doesn't make it 40% and 60%... it makes it 13% and 87%... i'm not criticising your figures... just your mathematics
10 +30
------------ = 40%...duh?
100 100
True, I'm not saying either is right. It's too retarded of an argument for me to bother with the math. And yeah, it changes again if you include all OS's. Then you've got people who multiboot or use more than one OS. Should they be counted as 1 or .5 (or .33 even)?13 87 OR 40 70 don't work. what about unix, solaris, bsd, linux users?