- Joined
- Dec 15, 2008
- Messages
- 2,617
- Reaction score
- 7
- Trophies
- 2
- Age
- 30
- Location
- Vancouver, B.C
- Website
- Visit site
- XP
- 980
- Country


Well the G1 is awful, so yes.Canonbeat234 said:Hmm, should I continue its legacy by replacing this G1 with G2?
Not if you use cyan 2.2.Urza said:Well the G1 is awful, so yes.Canonbeat234 said:Hmm, should I continue its legacy by replacing this G1 with G2?

Custom images improve performance, but not by enough.IchigoSJ said:Not if you use cyan 2.2.Urza said:Well the G1 is awful, so yes.Canonbeat234 said:Hmm, should I continue its legacy by replacing this G1 with G2?

I agree but it doesn't deserve to be called awful, decent describes it better.Urza said:Custom images improve performance, but not by enough.IchigoSJ said:Not if you use cyan 2.2.Urza said:Well the G1 is awful, so yes.Canonbeat234 said:Hmm, should I continue its legacy by replacing this G1 with G2?
Compare to any decent handset and the MSM7k series chipsets feel like molasses mixed with corn starch.

G2 Touch, technically.IchigoSJ said:I agree but it doesn't deserve to be called awful, decent describes it better.
Then you have lower standards than I.
QUOTEHuh? The T-mobile G2 is already out and looks nothing like that, but then again name changes are very confusing.