I don't know if it's the same, but bylaws has been working on that for awhile. Check here. It's why we have L4T Linux. It was easier to build Android from Linux, than to go straight to Android. So he got Linux running, so he could get Android running.

 

What are some of the emulation implications for this? Would an emulator run better on this than, say, Ubuntu? What has greater overhead?

 

You will have access to more emulators designed specifically for aarch64.

 

What is better? App optimized with one platform in mind or for all platforms in terms of performance, with the same amount of worktime that devs took to make app? Linux is made with all platforms in mind, when Android is made for ARM.

 

Yes! Cyberpunk 2077 portable confirmed!

 

Emummc shouldn't have an impact on the decision making for using linux though

 

tbf if you have a vita or 3ds (only gms 3 on 3ds) you can do that

mgs 3 is amazing

 

That isn't true, Android runs on x86/x64 as well. I wouldn't expect there to be any performance differences between Android or Linux, as long as there aren't any stupid mistakes.

 

I mean shield tv

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...FjAFegQIAhAB&usg=AOvVaw0JrLCic3bfzWJ11CQH6vfe

 

This has definitely been posted elsewhere, but is still very cool. Having a mass-market, single configuration unit also means that there is a much higher likelihood that whatever comes from this will be fairly stable and updated regularly.

That being said, isn't access to console games one of the main reasons for getting a console in the first place? If so, wouldn't installing a general purpose OS like this kind of defeat the purpose?